Understanding potential costs when a volunteer gets hurt.
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Many churches rely heavily on volunteer labor for remodeling or construction projects. But hazardous work such as building repairs, remodeling, new construction, and roof replacement can pose dangers for your volunteers and your ministry. Before volunteer work begins, take steps to reduce the risk of injury: Make sure the project is conducive to volunteer labor. Large or complex construction or demolition jobs are best left to professionals. Keep in mind that working on roofs, ladders, or scaffolding is inherently dangerous. Be sure to instruct volunteers on safe work procedures and the safe use of all equipment. Designate a project leader who understands the importance of safety and who will be alert to unsafe behavior that could result in injury. Enlist only volunteers who are skilled and physically capable of undertaking the work assignment required of them. Although the law varies from state to state, in most states, volunteers will not be covered under workers’ compensation statutes. So if a volunteer were injured while working for your church, medical coverage may be available only under your church’s general liability “premises medical payments” policy. Check with your insurance agent to determine the extent of your coverage and the circ*mstances under which it may cover volunteer injuries. If your church undertakes a large project, consult your attorney to make sure all potential liability exposures have been addressed. You may wish to consider having volunteers and independent contractors sign a “hold harmless” agreement to protect the church against liability claims resulting from the project. This article originally appeared on BrotherhoodMutual.com. Used with permission.Volunteers May Not Qualify for Workers’ Compensation
Simple steps you can take.
Nick B. Nicholaou
When First Baptist (not the church’s real name) hired a network engineering firm to help them with their computer system, they never dreamed they were inviting in thieves. But when employees of the firm saw the scope of information saved in the church’s database, they copied it and rented the list to businesses that wanted to reach people in their community, segmenting it by various demographics—including contributions! Data is one of the most valuable assets a church has, but trying to figure out what it’s worth so we can adequately protect it is challenging. Protecting data isn’t difficult, but the task must be approached as deliberately as the fire and security protection we apply to our church buildings. The first step is to recognize that your church has different kinds of data, and classifying data helps set a value to strategically protect it. While some data is mission-critical, other data is merely convenient. The difference is often found in answering the question, “What would happen to our church and our ministries if this data was made public or was destroyed?” Data that might be considered mission critical includes: Databases. Databases contain names and contact information, and sometimes include contribution, attendance, baptism, and other data that help us serve our congregations. Unfortunately, most churches have more than one database. In addition to lost efficiencies and synergies, multiple databases add complexity to the task of data protection. Church databases can include true databases, spreadsheets, document files, contact lists, and, of course, the Rolodex™. Sermons and Lesson Preparation. Sermons and lessons and the research behind them. Communications. Letters and e-mail between the organization and others—both internal and external. Graphic Files. Photos, videos, bulletins, programs, promotional posters, and audio files. Governmental Documents. Church meeting minutes, agendas, meeting notices, etc. Custom Programming. Templates or any other items that have been customized to help communicate and serve with uniqueness. Threats to data security can be classified as either internal or external. Internal. Good employees sometimes become disgruntled employees. Hardware sometimes crashes. Vendors sometimes develop sticky fingers. We are constantly being attacked with malicious software (called “malware”) in the form of spyware and Trojan horses. External. Burglars, external catastrophes like hurricanes and earthquakes, and those who try to hack into systems that are connected to the Internet. As we monitor our clients’ network security, we see almost constant evidence of Internet programs (called “bots”) trying to exploit operating system vulnerabilities. Their goal is to grab data or computer resources to serve the interests of others. Some data, if lost, would cause no real damage. But other data losses could really hurt. Consider, for instance, if your membership database was no longer available, or if members’ private information was made public. This is a critical situation for churches and ministries that process online or ACH contributions and keep donors’ financial account information in the database. In the wrong hands, that information could allow others access to donors’ accounts! Therefore, losing the database would have the greatest impact on your church and its membership, so protecting the database should be the highest priority. This protection can take multiple forms. Jason Powell, information technology director at Granger Community Church in Granger, Indiana, says, “Our database is the center of what is done on our network. If it were lost, the cost to reconstruct it would be huge; worth it, but huge.” Spending a little to protect it in advance is good stewardship. The second priority is to safeguard data files that are foundational to the ministry. These include communications with governmental authorities as well as the church’s own governmental records (agendas, minutes, meeting notices, etc). Records of this type may become critical in re-establishing a church or ministry following a catastrophe. The third priority is to preserve letters and e-mail communications that cannot be easily re-created. Few things tangibly say who you are like familiar graphics, and this type of data is the fourth priority. Whether it includes bulletins and programs, promotional formats, or photo, video, or audio files, these are often irreplaceable pieces of church history that help many feel a little more comfortable in a crisis. They communicate who you are, and should be protected. Because of their size, however, these types of files are often eliminated from daily backup routines. The fifth protection priority is custom software programming, usually in the form of templates and database modifications. Data is usually best protected by applying layers of protection. We recommend the following: The following additional steps will help protect against data loss if you should experience a local or regional catastrophe: Your data, though difficult to objectively value, is one of your most significant assets. Because your ministry is heavily dependent on data, implementing some fairly simple policies and procedures will go a long way towards protecting your ministry.Data Threats
Prioritizing Data Protection
Layers of Protection
Regional Disasters
Protect the safety of your church staff.
James F. Cobble Jr., Editor Emeritus
Bio
Compassion, anxiety, bewilderment … these are just a few of the words that describe how church secretaries and other staff members feel about working with transients and others who come to the church seeking personal help. Often, church secretaries work alone at the church office and when confronted by a street person seeking money, they are caught between a desire to help and personal fear for their own safety. Helping the poor is central to the church’s mission. But that does not mean that such help should be done thoughtlessly or without concern for the welfare and safety of those who work with the needy. To avoid problems, church staff members need training and guidance in responding to transients and to other individuals seeking help. Church leaders should take the initiative to see that their church has developed an adequate set of policies and procedures to respond to those who come to the church seeking assistance. Often, the secretary is at the church alone when these situations occur. Clearly, such scenarios require advanced planning. Any organization that provides resources to those in need will also attract those who attempt to abuse the system. This is especially true of churches. The Christian emphasis upon caring and compassion can be viewed by the con artist as an invitation for easy pickings. Often, those who try to con church staff members are in as much need as are others who seek help. The difference, however, is that the con artist uses lying and deception to swindle staff members. When the con artist succeeds in securing financial assistance, it perpetuates dishonesty and takes away limited resources from others who deserve help.Develop a safe response plan
Responding to the con artist
James F. Cobble, Jr., received his master of divinity degree from McCormick Theological Seminary, and also has doctoral degrees from both Princeton Theological Seminary and the University of Illinois.
7 rules to help volunteer leaders protect themselves and the kids they serve.
Frank Sommerville, Attorney, CPA
Bio
Teens are among the most unpredictable individuals on the planet. One moment, they’re independent with almost adult-like qualities, but at the next can be childlike and dependent upon adults. Providing the appropriate amount of guidance is a common concern for volunteer youth leader. But there are risks to working with students, too. These seven rules will help provide “defensive” guidance to help you avoid situations that may compromise your ministry and the well being of those you serve. 1. The “never alone” rule. Leaders should take care to always meet with students in the presence of a third party. When a youth worker is alone with a teen, he is placing his future in the teen’s hands, since most authorities will give the benefit of the doubt to the teen, not the adult leader. Avoid this situation by always having a third party present when meeting with a teen. In a one-on-one mentoring relationship, consider meeting in an open, public place. An easy place to overlook this rule is in the car, but workers should never be alone in with a teen in a car. Even if a student needs a ride, be cautious and responsible and make sure you are not alone. Remember: with only two witnesses present, the authorities tend to believe the teen, not the adult. 2. The “opposite sex” rule. This may seem obvious, but it is important to state: adult leaders should avoid developing close emotional relationships with teens of the opposite sex. What a leader may view as innocent conversation, a teen may see as flirting. Take precautions by asking other leaders for feedback on your interactions with students. If others question your motives or communication, change your style. This is especially necessary with teens that are vulnerable and need affirmation from the opposite sex. Students’ emotions are basically a rollercoaster, and students are apt to develop crushes on members of the opposite sex whom they respect. If a teen develops an emotional bond with a worker, she may become angry when that worker rejects her attentions. Sometimes this anger can turn into false accusations, including criminal accusations. Adult leaders should also exercise extreme caution in dealing with teens of the same sex. If a teen is confused about his sexual identity, he may attempt to develop a close relationship with a worker of the same sex. Again, this relationship is fraught with hazards. While the adult leader may counsel the teen regarding sexuality, it is critical to avoid building unhealthy emotional bonds. 3. The “more time” rule. Related to the first two rules, it is important to monitor “off duty” time spent with students. If the amount of time that you spend with a student becomes inordinate, take precautions to avoid awkward situations that could lead to false accusations. If a student frequently seeks out the company of a leader, it might be a sign that an unhealthy relationship is developing. The adult leader should keep track of her time together and discuss the situation with the supervisors and parents of the teen. A corollary to this rule is this: if an adult leader is meeting consistently with a student to discuss life issues, those meetings should not go on for more than eight weeks. After eight weeks, the chances that a student will become unhealthily dependent on the leader increase dramatically. If the teen needs further assistance, the worker should refer the student to a professional counselor. 4. The “no confidentiality” rule. Youth leaders should never promise confidentiality to a student. Under most state child abuse laws, youth ministry workers are required to report any circ*mstance where a child has been or is in danger of being harmed emotionally, sexually, or physically. If an authority figure, such as a parent or law enforcement officer, requests information about a teen, the youth leader must fully disclose his or her knowledge. Failure to respond appropriately is not in the best interest of the student and may result in criminal charges against the worker. For example, if a teen shares with a youth worker that she has been sexually abused, the worker must report this activity to the student’s parents and other authorities, and possibly to the state’s child protective services. 5. The “transparency” rule. Youth leaders need a system of accountability where they can be absolutely transparent about their behavior. Some churches require weekly or monthly statements from all workers stating that they haven’t behaved inappropriately toward their teens. Examples of inappropriate behavior include sending or receiving text messages containing prohibited language or meetings that violate the church’s policies. At the very least, workers should meet regularly with an accountability partner, another trusted believer who will ask direct questions. 6. The “no p*rn” rule. Youth leaders need to be aware of the reality of p*rnography in students’ lives. Because p*rnography dehumanizes individuals, teenagers who seek it out tend to separate sexual activity from relationships, making them much more likely to sexually harass others. Apart from the damage done to the teens themselves, adult leaders are at risk to be sued for inadequate supervision if one teen accuses another of sexual harassment in a church setting. If a leader finds out that a teen is looking at p*rn (a picture on a cell phone, for example) the leader should take steps to address the situation. In most cases, this will require informing the parents and referring the teen to counseling. Child p*rnography is particularly serious matter, and if a worker becomes aware child p*rnography in the hands of a teen, the church’s attorney should be contacted immediately. 7. The “no fear” rule. The center of judgment in the human brain doesn’t fully develop until about age 25. This explains why teens sometimes lack healthy decision-making skills. In fact, often, they think they are invincible, 40-feet tall, and bulletproof. Youth leaders must watch for risky activities and behavior, both to protect students and to keep themselves free from accusations of negligent supervision. As soon as a dangerous behavior comes up, leaders need to confront the student. When teens are in the care and custody of the church, there must be adequate adult supervision at all times. It is far better to cancel an activity than to risk harm, injury, or accusations.
Frank Sommerville is a both a CPA and attorney, and a longtime Editorial Advisor for Church Law & Tax.
There’s more to workplace justice than good intentions.
David P. Gushee
Large secular businesses often do better than Christian institutions in creating structures of justice to govern their organizations. Both their size and legal requirements require them to focus on procedures rather than relationships. But when Christian organizations fail to treat their people fairly or to protect the assets with which God has entrusted them, we are rightly embarrassed. Christian organizations need to learn from their secular counterparts how seemingly impersonal structures of justice actually increase trust. Consider the following true stories: A staff minister at a local church was called in and fired, effective immediately. No warning had been extended. No program for work improvement had been designed. At the meeting, no explanation was given for the firing. No grounds of appeal were offered. No severance package was tendered. Later, the minister discovered that vicious, unfounded rumors of personal immorality had been circulating, but he was given no opportunity to respond. Embezzlement of Sunday collections has emerged as a concern in the U.S. Catholic Church. A survey by Villanova University of 76 dioceses found that 85 percent of them reported cases of embezzlement within the past five years, with 11 percent of those cases involving sums greater than $500,000. In 2007, the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP) announced it was challenging the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) to improve its handling of sex abuse allegations in Baptist congregations. Turning its attention from its home community, the Roman Catholic Church, SNAP urged the SBC executive committee to create an independent review board to deal with sex-abuse accusations. SBC president Frank Page correctly noted that Baptist polity does not permit centralized oversight of local churches, but he acknowledged the need for churches to conduct background checks and to tighten recommendation procedures for job candidates. Anyone who works in a large secular company is given a personnel policy manual as thick as the Manhattan phone book. These manuals almost always contain detailed policies for dealing with issues related to personnel, financial management, and sexual harassment and abuse. The companies would never think of “winging it” when it comes to such serious issues. Instead, they put into place policies and procedures that apply standards of justice, good stewardship, transparency, oversight, and due process. They do not always get it right. But at least they are making the effort. As the examples above show, churches and Christian organizations often demonstrate an appalling weakness in this area. They often have no policy for dealing with staff performance issues, for handling terminations, for appeals processes. They trust pastors and other leaders with money and little oversight. They improvise their responses to sexual impropriety and abuse on a case-by-case basis. Indeed, when New Life Church implemented a planned response to Pastor Ted Haggard’s now infamous relationship with a male prostitute, it showed the importance of being prepared. But New Life Church is the exception that proves the rule. It is not clear why we so often choose to wing it. But here are some possible reasons. Many churches are very small, almost mom-and-pop operations. They have never felt the need for a personnel manual, a sex-abuse allegation procedure, or a financial-oversight plan. Some organizations also have an internal culture of authoritarianism. The pastor or leader is “God’s man” for the job, and members are called to submit and obey. No one is allowed to check on whether the shepherd has really become a wolf. The ethos of trusting informality that so often characterizes churches is another factor. Who can be against trust? Sadly, it looks like Ronald Reagan’s dictum of “trust but verify” is the better approach. Human nature is what it is. We are not yet fully redeemed, not even in the church (imagine that!). The open doors and open hearts of the church also leave us wide open to sharks, predators, and temptation. It may seem counterintuitive, but creating policies to encourage just treatment can actually build trust. When such policies require financial transparency and limit one-on-one pastoral contact to visible spaces, they speak of our willingness to be open about our activities. And that willingness feeds trust. Finally, we have an underdeveloped approach to justice. We too often wait for something to go wrong before we try to fix it. Thus, we tend to equate justice with punishment. But a better understanding of justice sees the importance of prevention: establishing a context in which right relationships and fairness can grow, be maintained, and be restored among sinful people—especially those sinners who are attempting to live for Jesus Christ. Love, trust, and good will are not enough. So bring on those policy manuals, and the commitment to justice that goes with them. Dr. David P. Gushee is a distinguished university professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University. This article first appeared in Christianity Today magazine. To learn more about employee handbooks, purchase the downloadable resource Your Guide to Ministry Employee Handbooks, available on ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com.
How to know when a new bookstore or childcare center will attract IRS attention.
John R. Throop
Churches and religious organizations start revenue-generating operations for two reasons. For some, the activity starts as a ministry and is intended to remain that, but the ministry generates some nonvital cash flow. For others, cash flow is critical to the success of the ministry. The difference between the two types of cash flow is critical to the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS has been paying closer attention to the business operations of tax-exempt organizations to determine whether each activity is an extension of the mission of the organization or a freestanding business with income that should be taxed. The IRS allows nonrelated business income. But income—as distinct from donations—is taxable if it stems from an activity not “substantially related” to the organization’s activities and income. What does that mean? According to IRS regulations, “substantially related” means the trade or business must “contribute importantly to the accomplishment of the exempt purpose of an organization.” The IRS applies three standards when considering whether the activities of tax-exempt organizations are taxable. Income is presumed to be exempt from taxes unless the activity In addition, the income must amount to at least $1,000 in a fiscal year. An exempt organization that has $1,000 or more or gross income from an unrelated business must file Form 990-T. See Unrelated Business Income Tax Returns and the Form 990-T instructions for more information about return filing at www.irs.gov. So how should churches proceed? Here are some examples worth considering: To help avoid an IRS audit, church leaders need to take four steps: Clarify your mission. A mission statement answers the question “What kind of business are you in?” It provides a reference for board and staff members to decide whether a particular activity or ministry is consistent with the church’s mission. Separate ministry from business. While there is no definitive rule about when a church should consider separately incorporating a ministry that becomes a business unit, many churches find that an activity becomes a business when its liability risk becomes significant, and/or when the church board discovers that this operation is gobbling up the time of staff members. If a nonministry operation contributes 50 percent to 80 percent of the church’s income, it could raise red flags for the IRS. Note: It’s possible to form a subsidiary corporation that puts its profits back into the business and into the church. Take care in property use. Churches are most vulnerable on this point. Be very careful when considering rental income to help finance a construction project. Make sure building plans move ahead without undue delay. If your church receives land as a gift, liquidate it unless a ministry, like a church camp, will be developed on the property within ten years. Retain a skilled attorney. “Any larger church must have someone acting as general counsel who is familiar with the activities of the church,” says attorney Chip Watkins. If a church plans to undertake a nontraditional revenue-producing activity, church leaders should first come to grips with the business vs. ministry issue. “There often is a way to structure the church’s activity for exempt purposes without generating income as a trade or business,” Watkins says. After all, it’s wiser for churches to focus on the business of making disciples rather than making a profit.Steps to Help Avoid an Audit
One case illustrates why you need to be proactive in your counseling procedures.
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
An Illinois court ruled that a woman who was sexually seduced by the pastor during marriage counseling could sue the pastor, a deacon, and the church. The woman and her husband claimed that during the course of marital counseling the pastor initiated and continued a sexual relationship with the woman, thereby aggravating the problems in her marriage, alienating them from their church and church community, and causing them emotional and psychological damage. The couple sued the pastor on the following grounds: intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligent infliction of emotional distress; breach of fiduciary duty; alienation of affections; assault and battery; and marriage counselor malpractice. The couple also sued a deacon for slander and negligent supervision of the pastor. And they sued the church for negligence. Specifically, they claimed that the church was negligent in failing to supervise the pastor despite the fact that it knew, or should have known, that his previous attractions to female congregation members created an unreasonable risk that his religious and marital counseling would be ineffective and potentially detrimental to those being counseled.
The couple insisted that the church had a duty to all members of the congregation to use reasonable care in training, assigning, controlling, and supervising its pastor with respect to providing religious and counseling services. They claimed that the pastor’s actions damaged them in a number of ways, including the wife’s contraction of two venereal diseases, medical bills incurred in treating these venereal diseases, psychological damages, counseling expenses, and deterioration in their marriage. The couple’s case was initially dismissed, but, since the matter was not related to doctrine, a later court reversed the decision and allowed the lawsuit to hold the pastor, deacon, and church responsible.
What You Need to Know About Counseling Risks
- A church may be legally responsible for a pastor’s sexual contact with an adult counselee, if it was negligent in hiring or supervising the pastor.
- Church leaders who ignore accusations of sexual misconduct by a church employee are subjecting their church to possible civil liability on the basis of negligence. They may also be subjecting their church to punitive damages and themselves to personal liability, if their actions constitute gross negligence.
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
The risks and rewards of inviting big groups.
Karen Arneson
Recently, a friend invited me to a special event at her church, which was being sponsored by her women’s group. It sounded like a great way to check out the church and meet some new people, plus childcare would be provided. When we arrived, we left our kids in the preschool room with a dozen other children and two adults. After the event, we returned to pick up our sons. The caregivers were chatting with each other while my friend’s child busied himself with toy trucks. I didn’t see my child. Not yet concerned, I checked around the room, but he wasn’t there. When it became clear the caregivers had no idea when he left or with whom he’d left, my anger was second only to my terror. Imagining my three-year-old abducted, or wandering into traffic, I began to panic. Fortunately, he was found roaming the hallways. But the damage had been done; I never set foot in that church again. Whenever churches open their doors to the public they expose themselves to both opportunity and risk. A well-run event maximizes the opportunity and takes precautions against the risk. How do churches ensure the success of their promotional endeavors and protect themselves from liability? Tracy Baer, Event Manager for Christ Community Church (CCC) in South Elgin, Illinois and Don Corbisello, Business Administrator for Christian Life Center (CLC) in Bensalem, Pennsylvania shared their insights. Tracy has managed many large-scale events including one featuring a 13-foot-tall cucumber named Larry—that’s right, Larry the Cucumber of Veggie Tales fame. Others have included hosting contemporary Christian artists such as Superchick, Salvador, and the 33 Miles/Avalon concert. Tracy’s church regularly hosts a comedy club, which has been a sold-out event for three years at all three Christ Community Church campuses. Don’s church has hosted the well-known Women of Faith conference, and authors/ speakers Gary Smalley and Tim LaHaye among others. The church is also used for local events such as high school graduations or performances by the Delaware Valley Philharmonic. In addition, a local television forum is broadcast from their location. Bench-style seating accommodates up to 1800 people in the auditorium at CLC. Smaller events may be held in the gym, foyer, coffee shop, or classrooms. The church is equipped with a full-service kitchen and prepares food on-site. Christ Community Church is a 160,000 square foot facility with room for 1900+ in the worship center. Theater-style seating including balconies make this an ideal place for large events. The gym serves smaller crowds of up to 800, or converts to a banquet hall for 500. In addition, the chapel seats 400. Though the churches are similar in size, their approaches to event management differ. Christian Life Center relies on their website, paper forms, and verbal communication. Christ Community Church employs a computer network with event management software for in-house planning as well as using their website to publicize events. Both agree on the bottom-line to a successful event: communication. Hosting events is one way churches reach out to their community. But not all events are worth sponsoring. Approval should be based on the purpose of the event. Any events you sponsor should adhere to the values of your church and advance your ministry purposes. At CCC, sponsoring ministries must evaluate the experience in terms of how it meets the core values of Belonging, Growing, Reaching, and Serving. If an event passes this test, an “Event Approval Form” is submitted for review and approval by three parties: the team captain, administration director, and finally, the executive pastor. The approval form begins the planning process by asking the questions: what is the target demographic (school-aged kids, college, 30s)? What is the potential attendance? How will you promote the event? How will you measure a win? Will you use volunteers? What is your estimated budget? What is your estimated income? Which ministries will you call upon for assistance? It’s preferred that this form be completed and submitted 18-24 months, but no later than 6 months, prior to the occasion. At CLC, a “General Request Form” is submitted three weeks prior to the proposed event. The Logistics Committee evaluates the request in terms of how the event promotes the Kingdom of God or growth within the church. Don points out that just because an event is labeled “Christian” does not mean it receives automatic approval. For example: Christian Life Center turned down the request from a Christian wrestling association not because there is anything particularly wrong with wrestling, but because they saw no connection to furthering the kingdom or growing in Christ. This policy becomes the deciding factor should there be conflict in scheduling. Though it’s rare for two events to compete for the same space, if it happens, the event that most closely aligns with the mission of the church is chosen. The “General Request Form” used at CLC is a four-page document that also addresses facility and equipment approval, provides space to diagram the room layout, and includes sections for requesting vehicles, finances, food service, and childcare. It’s a one-step process. The custodial staff is assigned the task of making equipment available, while it is the responsibility of the sponsoring ministry to set up and clean up the rooms used. At CCC, once an event is approved, it is entered into Event Management Software (EMS). EMS is populated with inventory, room availability, memory-jogger questions, and checklists to assist in the planning process. As decisions are made, the information is entered into the software and available to all involved. Tracy has also created an Event Planning Guide that is available through a wiki on-line document system accessible by staff members from any computer in the network. This handy reference keeps everyone up to speed on the process of planning. Events are a team effort at Christ Community Church. Planning meetings include the event manager, facilities manager, and representatives from all involved ministries such as Creative Arts, Sound, Technical Support, and Communications. Once approval has been granted and needs identified, it’s time to talk with the featured talent. Three months before the event, Tracy expects to receive a contract for negotiation. The negotiation stage is the time to nail down every possible aspect of the event—liability, payment, cancellation fees, volunteer needs, resource needs, catering needs, bus stock, sound and tech support, merchandise proceeds, additional traveling sponsors with the group, stage requirements, and so on. The largest contract rider Tracy has dealt with was 37 pages long. “Everything has to be nailed down in writing before a contract is signed, all the way down to who is expected to clean up,” says Tracy. Both churches have in-house graphic design capabilities for the production of advertising materials such as posters or flyers as well as tickets. In addition, both churches promote events through the church websites, bulletins, and announcements. Registration and ticketing are handled in a variety of ways. At CLC, interested patrons may phone in registration, register on the church’s website, or sign-up on site. Tickets are available at the church following services. Depending on the size of the event, CCC may use their internal database for registration, or for larger crowds, the second option is external ticketing software by ServiceU – TicketU. This method allows for sales of tickets online or through the on-site box office. According to Tracy, “one of the biggest challenges with this many people is making them feel welcome while maintaining a level of security.” Christ Community Church staff and volunteers are organized into teams, each with a particular area of responsibility. The First Impression Team’s goal is to make visitors feel welcome. It begins in the parking lot. CCC has a quarter mile driveway and approximately five acres of parking lot. Traffic Team members, in bright orange coats, wave flashlights to direct drivers to designated parking. Use of cones, signage with arrows, portable lighting, and friendly, smiling parking attendants helps visitors find their way and reduces anxiety. Once inside, greeters welcome guests, have them sign-in and procure nametags before handing them off to ushers, who help them find their way to the auditorium and seating. Signing in and out and wearing nametags is standard security protocol at CCC. In the event of an evacuation or shut-in, they need to be able to account for all persons in the building. During the event, the Security Team ensures safety by prohibiting admittance to those without tickets, and by patrolling the interior to encourage guests to stay in designated areas. Once the event is underway, Traffic and Security Teams monitor the parking lot for suspicious activities. The Security Team consists of off-duty and retired police officers, and they are ready to serve as liaison with the police department, should any interaction with them become necessary. The safety of guests is a responsibility CCC takes seriously. The Medical Response Team is on-hand to attend to any medical emergency and to act as point person with the local fire and rescue department. As an added measure of protection, each staff member, medical or security personnel as well as ushers and greeters are assigned a number from the paging system. This number is flashed on a screen near the stage if management needs to alert them of an emergency. Additional Maintenance Team members are on hand to monitor restrooms for trash, cleanliness and supplies, and dispose of trash accumulation in the auditorium and hallways. At the end of the event, guests are bid a warm good-bye and pass once again into the care of Traffic and Security team members as they exit the grounds. At Christian Life Center visitors are no less valued than those at CCC, but logistics differ based in large part on the differences in their facilities. CLC is surrounded by parking, and guests are always within 40 yards of an entrance. This close proximity to the building eliminates the need for parking attendants. It is the responsibility of the sponsoring ministry to recruit volunteers to greet and usher guests. During events, custodial staff does double-duty as security. In addition to maintaining a healthy environment, custodians walk throughout the building to redirect people who have wandered from the event and monitor the parking areas. In case of emergency, 9-1-1 is notified and police and/or fire and rescue personnel intervene. What lessons can smaller churches glean from the procedures used by large congregations like CCC and CLC? How does a small church manage activities that involve welcoming the larger community to their facility? When Fellowship Church of Carol Stream hosted a Bible Quiz Meet that included teams from nine Midwestern churches, Anita McFarlane worked with a team of volunteers to insure that the event went off without a hitch. Before the actually planning began, Anita telephoned the church office and proposed several possible dates for the event. The event required physical space throughout the church, so she also contacted various ministry leaders to ask permission to use those rooms. With the date and space established, it was time to plan. Announcements ran in Sunday bulletins asking for volunteers-volunteers to provide and/ or prepare food, volunteers for set-up/tear-down, and volunteers to house quizzers and coaches. Registration was handled by e-mail. Each church was responsible for providing a list of registered quizzers and coaches and details about those needing to be housed. Once a headcount was established, a volunteer set the lunch menu and provided sign-up sheets with specific food items needed. A small fee was charged to pay for awards and (hopefully) cover the cost of any food that might be purchased if donations fell short. For the small church, volunteer help and donations are critical to the success of an event. According to Anita, the biggest risks in hosting a large group event at church are in the area of food and housing. Volunteers were cautioned to use food safety precautions, such as hand washing, to avoid unsanitary conditions when preparing and serving lunch. They were careful not to leave food out for an extended period of time. If families volunteer to open their home to host an event or house a visiting guest, they assume the liability for this. In this case, it’s a good idea to know what your homeowner’s insurance policy coverage includes. The problem with small churches hosting events is that they may forego some of the steps that larger churches take, such as having signed contracts that relate to the event, a security team to monitor people and property, and a medical team that’s on-site and ready to go in an emergency. No matter the size of the church, Tracy, Don, and Anita agree-communication is the key to successful event management. If you think you’ve asked someone to do something, ask again. If you think you’ve told someone a particular date or time, remind them. Be specific in instructions and document decisions. Plan ahead and require accountability along the way. Karen Casey Arneson is a freelance writer. This article originally appeared in Church Office Today. To learn more about hosting safe events, purchase the downloadable resource Hosting Large Events at Church, available on ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com.Communication is key
Choose events that advance ministry purposes
Determine the Needs
Negotiate the details upfront
Managing publicity and ticket sales
Communicate to Avoid Problems
When small churches host large events
The smaller the church, the greater the risk?
Advice for faith-based groups.
If the flu in your area is causing more severe disease, the Centers for Disease Control(CDC) and your local health department may suggest that people avoid close contact with others and avoid attending large gatherings, a practice often called social distancing. These measures are intended to slow the spread of flu. Religious traditions and obligations may make it difficult to implement social distancing measures. However, faith-based and other community groups can do some specific things to help keep their members healthy. What steps can leaders of religious services or community meetings take if there is an outbreak of flu in my community? To the extent possible, make decisions in accordance with your state and local health departments about community gatherings and religious services during widespread flu illness in your community. People should not be discouraged from gathering unless advised by public health officials. Encourage people to wash hands often with soap and water. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub. If soap and water are not available and alcohol-based products are not allowed, other hand sanitizers that do not contain alcohol may be useful. Remind people to cover their mouth and nose with a tissue when coughing or sneezing. It may prevent those around them from getting sick. Reduce crowding as much as possible. People gathering in close proximity may increase the risk of flu transmission. Identify which activities may increase the chance of spreading flu. Work with your local health department to make decisions about changing or limiting these activities in order to help keep people healthy. Many religious services and community meetings involve a time of greeting or recognition by shaking hands or hugging. Encouraging interaction without physical contact and implementing social distancing measures may reduce the spread of flu in your community. Some religious traditions and rituals emphasize eating and drinking from communal dishes and vessels. Flu transmission may be possible in these circ*mstances. If flu is circulating widely in your community, faith and community leaders may consider adjusting such practices in order to reduce the spread of flu. Check with your local or state health department. Encourage people with flu-like illness to stay home. The spread of flu may be decreased if people with flu-like illness stay home for at least 24 hours after they are free of fever without the use of fever-reducing medications. If there is widespread flu illness in your community, discuss the risks of attending gatherings for those at high risk of medical complications from flu. By avoiding gatherings, these individuals may reduce their risk of becoming ill with flu. Provide alternative options and venues for participation whenever possible for individuals who are ill, home-bound, or have a high risk of flu complications and will not be able to attend gatherings. This document was produced by the Center for Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Used with permission. It is excerpted from the downloadable resource Preparing Your Church for a Pandemic.
Ask key questions to avoid getting scammed.
Laura J. Brown
Most vendors are honest people who make a living from selling a product or providing a service. But occasionally, church leaders may encounter a salesperson or vendor whose word cannot be trusted. Such was the case for hundreds of churches nationwide who agreed to install “cost-free” computer kiosks in their lobbies. Unwittingly, they signed contracts obligating them to pay thousands of dollars in lease fees for these kiosks, many of which didn’t work at all. In April 2009, the Washington Post reported that Washington, D.C. sued five corporations involved in the alleged scam and asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate. Scams like these illustrate the importance of doing your homework before entering a vendor relationship, especially a long-term one. You wouldn’t sign a 30-year mortgage without knowing a little bit about the lender. Neither should you sign a vendor contract without asking some pertinent questions about the company’s reputation and expertise. If you’re going to be investing considerable time or money in a vendor, you’ll want to do a thorough evaluation to ensure a mutually beneficial relationship. Start by asking colleagues at other churches for their recommendations about a specific product or service. If they “adore” (or despise) their new copy machine, for example, they’ll be glad to share some information with you. Here are some questions to get your investigation started. Viability Experience Customer Service Some of these questions you’ll pose to the vendor; some you’ll want to investigate on your own. Of course, the amount of time you spend on research will vary, depending on the size and complexity of the purchase. It’s easy to get excited about a company’s offerings during a sales pitch. But there can be a gap between what sales materials promise and what a company can deliver. To get a better sense of what you’re signing up for, it’s important to talk with flesh-and-blood customers. This means asking your vendor for a list of references, and then contacting at least two of them. Official References Most vendors will give you a list of customers who are likely to give the company a glowing recommendation, but they may be worth calling, nonetheless. Customers may be willing to provide honest opinions on the company’s dependability, customer service, and their overall satisfaction with the vendor. Unofficial references It’s also good to find customers for “unofficial” references. You might be able to find other customers by looking on the vendor’s website for examples of past work, or by talking with other churches in your region. Phony References Checking references may alert you to a scam. For example, a vendor may direct you to a phony website or a satisfied “customer” who’s actually an accomplice. If a vendor provides just an email address, request a telephone number, too. Accept only references from companies with a verifiable mailing address and telephone number. Ideally, you’ll speak with a receptionist before talking with the actual reference person. It’s generally not a good idea to accept references from customers who call you. Use a Cheat Sheet To make the most of your reference checks, write up a list of questions you’d like to ask each of the customers you call. Be specific. Asking, “How’s their customer service?” will generally yield less useful information than: “How many customer service calls have you placed?” and “How long did it typically take for them to fix a problem?” Some salespeople encourage you to sign an agreement quickly, often using a price break or some other incentive that expires if you don’t act by a certain date. Never feel pressured to buy from a salesman. If you’re not satisfied that you know enough about the vendor to enter a written agreement, ask for time to think about the offer. Don’t sign any sales contract until you have reviewed it, preferably with an attorney, and confirmed that it matches the verbal agreement. If vendors truly want your business, they’ll work with you to establish a solid, trustworthy relationship between themselves and your church. Careful investigation can give you a great deal of insight into what might happen to your church if you were to enter an agreement with a vendor. By doing your due diligence up front, you can save your church the time, money, and heartache of getting duped by a scam. Laura J. Brown is a writer and communications specialist with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company. This article is excerpted from the downloadable resource How to Hire a Vendor.Do Your Research
Check References
Take Your Time
Research Yields Results
Create policies and procedures to protect older adults in your church.
Lindsey Learn
Many churches create child abuse protection plans to keep kids safe from abuse. Older adults, especially those who are housebound and unable to fully care for themselves, deserve our protection too. Seniors who have family members or caretakers that come into their homes to visit and care for them are especially vulnerable to neglect, exploitation, and abuse. Here are three things your pastoral staff should know and do to keep older adults in your church safe. Do you have volunteers who regularly visit shut-ins? Or a ministry to seniors that requires volunteers to serve one-on-one with the elderly? If so, take precautions to screen these workers carefully. Most abuse claims for churches hinge on the screening and selection process used for staff and volunteers. To reduce the risk of negligent screening, take care to select volunteers with clean background checks, strong references, and at least a six month history at the church. Here are some additional tips for selecting volunteers for your ministry:1. Screen Volunteers
Fill in the blanks. All prospective workers should complete a written application form. An application provides information that can be used to conduct reference checks and an interview.
Obtain asking rights. Your application form should include a liability release, signed by the applicant, giving you permission to contact references and obtain any criminal records. It also should release from liability the person being asked to provide information.
Check references. Contact all individuals, former employers, and organizations listed in the application. Learning what others say about an individual’s past performance and conduct is a vital part of the screening process.
Schedule an Interview. You’ll get a better sense of whether the applicant will be a good fit for your ministry when you meet in person.
Look for criminal records. Conduct a criminal records check on all paid and volunteer staff, even ministers, before putting them to work.
Evaluate the results. A criminal conviction may not disqualify someone from a church position. You’ll need to evaluate the severity of the offense, how long ago it happened, and whether it pertains to the position being filled. An attorney could help you with this analysis.
Whether volunteers or staff members are visiting the elderly in their homes or counseling them at church, there are red flags that should concern workers. The Administration on Aging gives the following warning signs of abuse: Similar to child abuse reporting laws, clergy may be mandated to report suspected elder abuse depending on your state’s laws. To find out if you’re a mandatory reporter of your state go to your state’s Department of Aging. Google your state’s Department of Aging to find the web address for your state. For example, a pastor in Illinois would go to the Illinois Department of Aging’s website and look under Elder Abuse and Prevention where it shows that clergy are not on Illinois’ list of mandatory reporters. The National Center on Elder Abuse also provides a directory for prevention resources by state, which can lead you to your state’s reporting laws. In the article “The Risks of Not Reporting Abuse,” Richard HCopyammar states, “Ministers are specifically identified as mandatory reporters under a few [state] statutes. But even if they are not, they may be mandatory reporters if they fall within a listed classification, such as school or child care workers and administrators, or counselors.” Though Hammar is speaking of reporting child abuse, many state laws follow similar statutes for elder abuse. If you are a mandatory reporter in your state, you may be required to report both suspected and actual cases of abuse. Failing to report what you know, could be considered a misdemeanor. The Administration of Aging encourages reporters to call 911 or a local police force if someone is in immediate danger, otherwise, you can find a reporting number for your state by visiting the Eldercare Locator website or calling 1-800-677-1116. It’s important to protect older adults in our congregations, especially when they are incapable of protecting themselves. If you haven’t created policies for protecting the elderly from abuse in your church, make this an agenda item for your next board or staff meeting to start crafting these plans.2. Recognize Signs of Abuse
3. Responsibility for Reporting Abuse
Can our church knowingly hire a person who is receiving workers’ compensation benefits?
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
We have a volunteer who gives a lot of time, maybe 20-30 hours a week. We do not pay him. He is receiving workers’ compensation from an ankle injury. One of our board members is concerned that there may be some liability issues for the church in having him volunteer that many hours while he is on workers’ compensation. Is this a valid concern? Workers’ compensation benefits are based on the nature and degree of an injured worker’s work-related injury. “Total disability” benefits may be awarded upon a finding that the injured employee can no longer perform compensated employment. As a result, a person’s eligibility to receive total disability benefits is directly affected if he or she begins performing compensated employment. And, such employment may not only result in a discontinuation of benefits, but also a legal obligation to return benefits already paid. Is a church subject to any penalties if it knowingly hires and compensates a person who is receiving workers’ compensation benefits? In most cases, the answer is no. It is the employee, and not the employer, who may be required to return benefits paid while he or she was earning wages from a job. Still, it is a “best practice” for churches to consider the following precautions: If a church employee is injured on the job (either at church or at a “second job”), and is receiving workers’ compensation benefits, be sure the employee is legally permitted to perform compensated employment before allowing him or her to continue working. If a church employee is injured on the job (either at church or at a “second job”), and is receiving workers’ compensation benefits, be sure the employee complies with any “notification” requirements prescribed by state law. Persons receiving workers compensation benefits may be required to notify a state agency if there is any improvement in their condition, or if they perform compensated employment. Failure to do so may make the recipient legally obligated to return some or all of the workers’ compensation benefits that were paid. Note that an injured employee is performing “compensated employment” (which may jeopardize eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits) if he or she is receiving compensation for performing services. The fact that the amount of compensation is small may be irrelevant. And, the employee cannot avoid disqualification by characterizing church compensation as “love gifts.” If your church has at least 15 employees, and is engaged in commerce, then you are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act. This Act generally prohibits covered employers from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of the disability of a person who is able to perform the essential functions of a job with or without reasonable accommodation by the employer. There are exceptions. For example, churches are permitted to discriminate on the basis of religion in their employment decisions. Many states have their own disability laws, and some of these laws apply to employers with fewer than 15 employees (and none requires interstate commerce).
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
Pros and cons of security technology.
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
Like security guards, crime-fighting technologies should be implemented as a result of either or both of the following grounds: (a) A legal duty to install technological devices may exist because the risk of shootings or other violent crimes on church property is highly foreseeable based on the following factors: (b) The use of one or more technological devices is deemed necessary to further a church’s theological and biblical principles, whether or not legally required. In evaluating the feasibility of various technologies to prevent or reduce the risk of shootings in public schools, the United States Department of Justice noted that the effectiveness, affordability, and acceptability of each technology must be considered. To illustrate, many church leaders would regard metal detectors at church entrances to be unacceptable, even if affordable and effective, because they are incompatible with the concept of “sanctuary” and are at odds with biblical assurances of providence and divine protection. For many smaller churches, such devices would be unaffordable. Listed below are three different devices that often are used to prevent or reduce the risk of crime. In each case, church leaders should consider the device’s effectiveness, affordability, and acceptability in evaluating its usefulness. Surveillance cameras ordinarily cannot prevent shootings and other violent crimes on church property, but they can act as a deterrent to crime, provide a record of what happened, allow church staff to monitor the entire church campus from a single location, and expedite a call to the police in the event of suspicious behavior. On the downside: (1) surveillance cameras are expensive, and this disadvantage is compounded when multiple cameras are employed; (2) someone must be tasked with the responsibility of continually checking the monitors, and this removes the person from performing more active surveillance by personally visiting areas where people congregate; (3) selecting the appropriate equipment requires technical knowledge; (4) ongoing maintenance and operational support are required; (5) some individuals will challenge the need for cameras in a church; (6) persons with knowledge of the installed video system’s capabilities may not be deterred by them, and possibly could circumvent the system to their advantage or simply carry out their criminal acts in a different area of the church; and (7) cameras will not deter dedicated assailants, especially if they plan on killing themselves at the end of their crime spree. “Experiments were run at Sandia National Laboratories 20 years ago for the U.S. Department of Energy to test the effectiveness of an individual whose task was to sit in front of a video monitors for several hours a day and watch for particular events. These studies demonstrated that such a task, even when assigned to a person who is dedicated and well-intentioned, will not support an effective security system. After only 20 minutes of watching and evaluating monitor screens, the attention of most individuals has degenerated to well below acceptable levels. Monitoring video screens is both boring and mesmerizing. There is no intellectually engaging stimuli, such as when watching a television program. This is particularly true if a staff member is asked to watch multiple monitors, with scenes of [persons] milling about in various hallways, in an attempt to watch for security incidents.” Department of Justice, Research Report: The Appropriate and Effective Use of Security Technologies in U.S. Schools. Most church leaders, even in high crime areas, would consider the use of metal detectors at church entrances to be so offensive to congregational members and visitors and so fundamentally incompatible with the nature of the church as a sanctuary, that their use would be unthinkable. As noted above, risk management technologies must be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, affordability, and acceptability. Even if metal detectors at church entrances would be an effective deterrent to violent crime, and affordable, they would be considered unacceptable by most church members. This would especially be so for churches in low crime areas, and with no history of shootings or other violent crimes on or near church property. In summary, the use of metal detectors at church entrances would be an extraordinary measure justified by only a high foreseeability of violent crime. Few churches, even in high crime areas, utilize these devices. Here are some points to note about metal detectors: “The initial purchase price of a portal metal detector is almost insignificant compared with the ongoing personnel costs to operate the equipment in a complete weapon detection program. An excellent example that illustrates this fact is the successful weapon detection program run by the New York City (NYC) Board of Education in about 50 of its inner-city high schools. For just one of its schools with about 2,000 students, the weapon detection program requires 9 security officers for approximately 2 hours each morning. Two officers run the two initial portal metal detectors, two officers run the baggage x-ray machines, one officer runs the secondary portal metal detector for students who fail the initialdetector, two officers (a male and a female) operate the hand scanners on students who fail the secondary metal detector, and two officers keep the students flowing smoothly and quickly through the system, such that nobody is able to bypass any part of the system. It should be noted that the only way these schools are able to avoid huge waiting lines, even with this much equipment and this many officers, and still get everybody to class on time is by a complete restructuring of their class periods. There is a significant staggering of first period start times so that the students arrive over a 90-minute period.” Department of Justice, Research Report: The Appropriate and Effective Use of Security Technologies in U.S. Schools. There are four principal ways that places of public accommodation can permit or deny access. The first and most common approach is manpower intensive, and the remaining three employ technology devices. These four approaches are: Such measures, like the use of metal detectors at church entrances, would not stop an armed and dedicated assailant. In addition, they would not be acceptable to most congregations since: Some churches use keypads or card readers during the week to restrict access to church employees.Surveillance Cameras
Metal Detectors
Entry Control Technologies
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
Security elements to consider when designing a new building.
Steve Edmonds
Aesthetics and acoustics used to be the cornerstones of church construction. Today, these concepts are still important, but rising crime rates have added another one: security. Not long ago, a pastor noticed one of his church’s four-wheeled dollies had been loaded with expensive sound equipment and was sitting beside a propped-open door. When he looked out the door, a van abruptly sped away. This happened on a normal weekday, while church employees were in the building. Criminals would find it just as easy to walk into the average church office on a weekday, hold a weapon to a staffer’s head, and start making demands. The days of confidently unlocking the church in the morning and leaving it open all day have passed—if they ever truly existed. If you’re planning to remodel, expand, or even build a new church building, it’s time to make some design decisions that can improve the safety of the people around you and protect the assets you steward. Limiting entry to your building is one of the most basic elements of church security, and you have many ways to do it. Your options range from simple deadbolt locks to electronically controlled access systems. Locks are the most common option. They’re affordable, easy to install, require little maintenance, and are pretty effective at keeping people out. However, users can compromise their effectiveness by hiding keys outside the building or distributing keys without a monitoring system. One costly drawback is that a locksmith must re-key the whole building if a key is misplaced, lost, or stolen. For best results, your church should limit key distribution. By placing an identifying serial number on each key, you can track who has which one. When someone leaves your organization, make sure that person returns the same key that you gave him or her. Electronic systems are becoming popular with churches because they provide more flexibility than locks. They’re costlier and more complex to install, but they come with a wide variety of options that can help to justify their expense. For example, you can program the system to limit admission to certain sections of a building at certain times of the day. You can make some parts of the building, such as the office area, accessible only to people who hold a certain key card or know a special password. In addition, you can cancel a lost or missing key card instantly without rekeying an entire building. Theft is no longer a crime committed only in the dark of night. Today’s thieves are brazen enough to walk into a church during business hours or during an activity, gather the items they wish to steal, and then calmly make their getaway. Design your building so that it can be locked in zones to provide secure havens for the staff people inside throughout the week. For example, you can allow visitors access to a lobby area but lock the office suite and remainder of the building. This gives you time to determine a visitor’s intentions before allowing him or her access to other parts of the facility. Another option is to lock the main doors and give your secretary the ability to “buzz” visitors in after screening them using an intercom and video monitor. You’ll want to protect areas that are highly valued or are susceptible to vandalism. Your school or nursery areas also require enhanced protection. For nurseries, create a check in and check out area that will impair someone from forcibly removing a child from the church or school’s custody. Finally, consider providing a secure location for counting church offerings. While most cash control measures are procedural, this is another area in which a church’s design can improve security. If a school for criminals existed, one of the primary lessons would be that churches collect money on Sundays and Wednesdays. When securing your building, don’t compromise fire safety. Equip exit doors with crash bars instead of deadbolts, so that people can leave the building quickly in an emergency. You may wish to consider crash bars that set off an audible alarm when someone pushes them, so people won’t prop doors open and defeat your security efforts. In today’s climate, experts often recommend a professionally installed, monitored, and maintained security system to protect your buildings. With central station monitoring, your building is under watch 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. When your system senses an emergency, a signal goes directly to the monitoring station. Trained professionals identify the signal—such as a burglary or other emergency—and notify you and the proper authorities. For an added layer of protection, you can also install video cameras. These are valuable for a number of reasons. Not only do they allow staff to view target areas of the property, but they can also record valuable information that can help law enforcement apprehend and convict criminals. Today’s cameras are small enough to be hidden inside exit lights, so they don’t draw attention to themselves or detract from your church’s appearance. Many people treat churches with special respect. However, some criminals intentionally pursue ministries because they perceive them to be easy targets. As a result, churches and related ministries are not exempt from the criminal elements facing any other organization. While you cannot hope to avoid all possible threats, there are many things you can do to minimize them, starting with basic church design. Make security the cornerstone of your building and you can help protect the people in your ministry and the assets in your care. Steve Edmonds is a senior loss control specialist for Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company. This article was adapted, and used with permission. To learn more about how to build a safe church, purchase the downloadable resource Building with Safety in Mind, available on ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com.Access Control
Zone defense
Fire Safety
Security Alarms and Video Cameras
Make Security Your Cornerstone
What you can and can’t ask.
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God (Romans 13:1). It is common for employers to interview applicants for employment in addition to having them complete a written application. This practice provides the employer with an opportunity to assess applicants’ suitability for a particular position. Church leaders should understand that several state and federal laws may restrict the kinds of questions that may be asked during an employment interview. Employers are legally entitled to ask questions that will help them determine if an applicant meets the requirements for a job. But, certain questions are not relevant to an applicant’s qualifications and should not be asked. For example, questions about an applicant’s race, national origin, disabilities, or age generally are not relevant to an applicant’s ability to perform the requirements of a job, and should not be asked. In rare cases, such questions may be permissible if based on a “bona fide occupational qualification.” Also, state and federal laws banning discrimination in employment on the basis of religion generally contain broad exemptions for religious organizations. As a result, it generally is permissible for religious organizations to exclude or prefer persons for employment on the basis of religion. Church leaders should periodically review questions that are asked during interviews, or on employment applications. Look at each question and ask, “Why are we asking this question? Is this information relevant to the qualifications for this position?” The following table summarizes the legal status of several kinds of questions. The table is not exhaustive and there may be exceptions. It assumes that an employer is covered under applicable state or federal nondiscrimination laws. Also, note that the “ministerial exception” generally bars the civil courts from reviewing decisions by churches and other religious organizations regarding the selection of ministers. This exception permits religious organizations to ask applicants for ministerial positions any questions they wish. See section 8-10 in Pastor, Church & Law, Volume 3: Employment Law.Tip
Interview Questions | ||
Question | Acceptable | Inadvisable |
Race or color | No. | Applicant’s race or color of skin. |
Question | Acceptable | Inadvisable |
Arrest record | No, unless job related | Number and kinds of arrests. |
Conviction record | Questions about actual criminal convictions if substantially related to a person’s ability or suitability for performing a specific job. | Questions about convictions unrelated to job requirements. |
Military service | Military experience or training if job related. | Type or condition of discharge; questions about military service for another country. |
Credit records | None, unless job related. | Questions about charge accounts, credit rating, bankruptcies, and garnishments. |
Religion | Religious organizations can ask applicants their religious affiliation, and give preference to applicant’s who share the organization’s religious beliefs. | — |
References | Names of professional and character references, including the applicant’s pastor or other religious leader. | — |
Birthplace and residence | Applicant’s place of residence, length of residence at that location and prior locations, and location of current employer. | Birthplace of applicant, or the applicant’s parents or other relatives; birth certificate, naturalization or baptismal certificate prior to hiring. |
Language | Languages the applicant speaks or writes fluently, if job related. | Applicant’s mother tongue; language used at home; how the applicant acquired the ability to read, write, or speak a foreign language. |
Name | Whether applicant has worked under a different name if necessary to allow a check of work or education records. | The original name of an applicant whose name has been legally changed or the applicant’s name. |
Question | Acceptable | Inadvisable |
Marital status | Whether the applicant is married, single, divorced, separated, or engaged, if relevant in assessing the applicant’s suitability for employment with a religious employer based on doctrinal considerations. | Whether the applicant is married, single, divorced, separated, engaged, or widowed, unless these questions are relevant in assessing an applicant’s suitability for employment with a religious employer based on doctrinal considerations. |
Citizenship | Documentation to establish the applicant’s identity and employment eligibility. | Birthplace of the applicant or any information not relevant to making employment decisions. |
Age | None, unless age is a bona fide occupational qualification. | Requesting age on employment application, using phrases such as “young, boy, girl, recent college graduate” on help wanted notices or advertisem*nts. |
Sex | None, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification (such as an applicant for a pastoral position with a church that is doctrinally opposed to the ordination of women). | An applicant’s sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification (such as an applicant for a pastoral position with a church that is doctrinally opposed to the ordination of women). |
Family status | If applicant has responsibilities or commitments that prevent him or her from meeting work schedules if asked of all applicants regardless of sex. | Marital status, number and age of children, spouse’s job. |
Pregnancy | Applicant’s anticipated duration of employment, if asked of all applicants. | Any questions about pregnancy, medical history, or family plans. |
Child care | None, unless job related and asked of all applicants. | Questions about child care arrangements that are only addressed to female applicants. |
Height and weight | None, unless job related. | Any question unrelated to job requirements. |
Question | Acceptable | Inadvisable |
Disability | Whether the applicant can perform the essential functions of the job in question. | Questions about an applicant’s disabilities. |
Organizations | Applicant’s membership in professional organizations if job related. | All clubs, social organizations, societies, and other non-job-related organizations to which the applicant belongs. |
Relatives and friends | Names of applicant’s relatives already employed by the employer. | Names of friends working for the employer or relatives other than those working for the employer. |
Photographs | None, except after hiring. | Photographs with an application or after an interview but prior to hiring. |
Sexual orientation | Many states have enacted laws prohibiting private employers from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of sexual orientation. All of these laws exempt religious employers. As a result, religious employers may ask applicants about their sexual orientation if required by the employer’s doctrine. | Many states have enacted laws prohibiting private employers from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of sexual orientation. All of these laws exempt religious employers. As a result, religious employers may ask applicants about their sexual orientation if required by the employer’s doctrine. |
> To learn more about hiring employees, purchase the downloadable resource Safe Hiring Practices for Ministries, available on ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com.
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
This checklist outlines the details of a corporate merger.
David Middlebrook
The following list is not exhaustive, but it will serve as a general outline of the necessary documents and steps for merging two entities. However, this checklist shouldn’t be substituted for proper legal advice. 1. Prior to Merger: Provide the following to legal counsel. 2. During the Merger: 3. After the Merger:
What churches must know about the last-minute ‘fiscal cliff’ deal.
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
In the early hours of 2013, Congress enacted the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA or the “Act”) in order to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff.” We’ve extracted provisions from the 157-page Act that are of most relevance to churches and church employees. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 has two major features—an increase in the tax rates paid by the wealthiest Americans, and an extension of several tax benefits that were scheduled to expire at the end of 2011 or 2012. Some expiring tax benefits were not extended. Most notably, Congress chose not to extend the so-called payroll tax “holiday” that reduced the Social Security taxes for both employees and the self-employed for the past two years. This results in a tax increase for three out of every four Americans in 2013. Expiration of the reduction in Social Security taxes. Prior to 2011, employees paid a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on all wages earned up to the annual “wage base” and self-employed individuals paid a 12.4 percent Social Security self-employment tax on all of their self-employment income up to the same threshold. Congress enacted legislation in 2010 providing for a payroll tax and self-employment tax “holiday” during 2011 of two percentage points off the employee share of Social Security tax, and the Social Security component of self-employment taxes. This meant that the employee share of Social Security taxes dropped from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent of wages, and the Social Security component of self-employment taxes dropped from 12.4 percent to 10.4 percent of self-employment earnings. This reduction in taxes was enacted to stimulate the economy by increasing the take-home pay of millions of workers. Congress enacted legislation in 2012 temporarily extending the payroll tax cut for employees and self-employed persons through 2012. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 does not extend the reduction in Social Security taxes after 2012. This has the following consequences: Churches, like any employer, must take into account the elimination of the reduction in Social Security taxes when withholding Social Security taxes from nonminister employees. Ministers are self-employed for Social Security, and pay the self-employment tax rather than Social Security and Medicare taxes. Their self-employment taxes will increase 2 percent beginning in 2013. To illustrate, a minister earning $50,000 in 2013 in the exercise of ministry will pay an additional $1,000 in self-employment taxes. The housing allowance exclusion applies only to income taxes, and not self-employment taxes. As a result, the 2-percent hike in self-employment taxes will apply not only to a minister’s salary, but also to any church-designated housing allowance and the annual rental value of a church-provided parsonage. Ministers should take into account the hike in self-employment taxes when computing their quarterly estimated tax payments for 2013 and future years.
Key point. The Affordable Care Act (the new healthcare law) contains an additional hike in Social Security and self-employment taxes for higher-income taxpayers. It increases the Medicare tax paid by both employees and self-employed persons by an additional 0.9 percent on wages in excess of a threshold amount beginning in 2013. However, unlike the general 1.45 percent Medicare tax on employee wages, or the 2.9 percent Medicare tax on self-employed workers, this additional tax is on the combined wages of the employee and the employee’s spouse, in the case of a joint return. The threshold amount is $250,000 in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse, $125,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case.
Impact on charitable contributions. Some analysts predict charitable contributions will decline as a result of the American Taxpayer Relief Act, for three reasons: First, charitable contributions are discretionary outlays and many high-income taxpayers may cut back on their contributions to offset the impact of higher taxes. According to the latest IRS statistics, higher-income taxpayers pay a larger percentage of their household income to charity than lower-income taxpayers. Will higher taxes cause the rich to cut back on their contributions? It’s too soon to tell, but the possibility exists. Second, the reinstatement of the “Pease limitation” (addressed below), which caps charitable contributions for the wealthy at 20 percent of the amount of their contributions, may cause higher-income taxpayers to cut back on their giving. Note that the Pease limit impacts taxpayers at a lower level ($300,000 for joint filers) than the higher-income tax rates ($450,000 for joint filers), which may disincentivize charitable giving for a larger group of taxpayers. Third, many taxpayers make some or all of their contributions by payroll deductions at work. Many of these taxpayers were stunned to see smaller paychecks in the early weeks of 2013 following the expiration of the 2-percent reduction in Social Security taxes that prevailed for the previous two years. Some undoubtedly will seek to offset the financial impact of higher Social Security withholdings by reducing or canceling contributions made by payroll deduction.
Key point. Several studies on the impact of charitable contribution limits on charitable giving have produced conflicting results. Some studies suggest that charitable giving is adversely affected by less favorable deduction rules, while other studies indicate that the effect is minimal.
Permanently extend the 10 percent bracket. Under prior law, the 10 percent individual income tax bracket expired at the end of 2012. Upon expiration, the lowest tax rate would increase to 15 percent. The Act extends the 10 percent individual income tax bracket for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012. Permanently extend the 25 percent, 28 percent, and 33 percent income tax rates for certain taxpayers. Under prior law, the 25 percent, 28 percent, 33 percent, and 35 percent individual income tax brackets expired at the end of 2012. Upon expiration, the rates were to increase to 28 percent, 31 percent, 36 percent, and 39.6 percent respectively. The Act permanently extends the 25 percent, 28 percent, and 33 percent rates on income at or below $400,000 (individual filers), $425,000 (heads of households), and $450,000 (married filing jointly) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, but lets the 35 percent rate for income above these amounts expire, which reinstates a tax rate of 39.6 percent for taxable income above these amounts.
Key point. The $400,000, $425,000, and $450,000 amounts are adjusted annually for inflation beginning in 2014.
Key point. The continuation of the lower tax rates for income up to $400,000 (individual filers), $425,000 (heads of households), and $450,000 (married filing jointly) is misleading, since many higher-income taxpayers will have little, if any, tax relief due to the application of the alternative minimum tax.
Key point. Many analysts have noted that the permanent extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for middle- and lower-income Americans will make it more difficult to achieve significant reductions in the $16.5 trillion federal deficit, which many do not believe will be possible without greater contributions from middle- and lower-income taxpayers.
Federal Income Tax Rates for 2013RateSingle filersJoint returns
10% | $0-$8,925 | $0-$17,850 |
15% | $8,925-$36,250 | $17,850-$72,500 |
25% | $36,250-$87,850 | $72,500-$146,400 |
28% | $87,850-$183,250 | $146,400-$223,050 |
33% | $183,250-$398,350 | $223,050-$398,350 |
35% | $398,350-$400,000 | $398,350-$450,000 |
39.6% | $400,000 and up | $450,000 and up |
Note that the table reflects marginal tax rates (the tax rates that apply only to the corresponding income described in the table). For example, a married couple with taxable income of $100,000 will not pay the 25 percent rate on this entire amount. Rather, the first $17,850 of taxable income will be taxed at 10 percent, and income from $17,850 to $72,500 will be taxed at 15 percent. Only income from $72,500 to $100,000 will be taxed at 25 percent, meaning that the couple’s effective tax rate will be 16.9 percent. This rate will be even lower when deductions, credits, and exclusions are considered. Permanently repeal the Personal Exemption Phaseout for certain taxpayers. In order to determine taxable income, an individual reduces adjusted gross income by any personal exemptions, deductions, and either the applicable standard deduction or itemized deductions. Personal exemptions generally are allowed for the taxpayer, his or her spouse, and any dependents. For 2012, the amount deductible for each personal exemption is $3,800. This amount is adjusted annually for inflation. Prior to EGTRRA, the exemption was phased out as a result of the Personal Exemption Phaseout (“PEP”) for taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) above a certain level. EGTRRA repealed the PEP over five years, beginning in 2006. The phase-out was reduced by one-third in taxable years beginning in 2006 and 2007, and by two-thirds in taxable years beginning in 2008 and 2009. The repeal was fully effective for taxable years beginning in 2010. In explaining the reason for repealing the phase-out, a congressional conference committee noted that “the personal exemption phase-out is an unnecessarily complex way to impose income taxes and the hidden way in which the phase-out raises marginal tax rates undermines respect for the tax laws.” The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA) extended the PEP repeal through 2012. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 extends the PEP repeal on income at or below $250,000 (individual filers), $275,000 (heads of households), and $300,000 (married filing jointly) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
Key point. The $250,000, $275,000, and $300,000 amounts are adjusted annually for inflation beginning in 2014.
Permanently repeal the itemized deduction limitation for certain taxpayers. In his acceptance speech during the 1988 Republican National Convention, presidential candidate George H.W. Bush famously pledged, “Read my lips: no new taxes.” Two years later, as president, he reluctantly broke his promise and signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. This Act raised taxes in a number of ways, including the so-called “Pease” limit on itemized deductions (named after Ohio congressman Don Pease, who first proposed it). This limit required certain itemized deductions, including charitable contributions, to be reduced by 3 percent of a taxpayer’s adjusted gross income over $100,000 (adjusted annually for inflation), but not by more than 80 percent. In 2001, Congress enacted a law (EGTRRA) that phased out the Pease limit by one-third in 2006 and 2007, by two-thirds in 2008 and 2009, and by 100 percent in 2010. EGTRRA contained a “sunset” provision calling for this and many other provisions to expire at the end of 2010. This would have reinstated the Pease limit beginning in 2011. However, Congress enacted legislation in 2010 extending the elimination of the Pease limit through 2012. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extends the repeal of the Pease limit on income at or below $250,000 (individual filers), $275,000 (heads of households), and $300,000 (married filing jointly) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
Key point. The $250,000, $275,000, and $300,000 amounts are adjusted annually for inflation beginning in 2014.
Example. A married couple with adjusted gross income of $400,000 in 2013 makes charitable contributions to their church of $50,000. Based on these facts alone, the couple’s Pease limitation would be $3,000 (3 percent of the amount by which their AGI exceeds the $300,000 threshold amount for married couples filing a joint return). As a result, the couple’s charitable contribution deduction would be $47,000 ($50,000 less $3,000).
Example. A single person with adjusted gross income of $500,000 in 2013 makes charitable contributions to his church of $75,000. Based on these facts alone, the donor’s Pease limitation would be $7,500 (3 percent of the amount by which his AGI exceeds the $250,000 threshold amount for single persons). As a result, the donor’s charitable contribution deduction would be reduced from $75,000 to $67,500.
Permanently extend the 2001 modifications to the child tax credit. Generally, taxpayers with income below certain threshold amounts may claim the child tax credit to reduce federal income tax for each qualifying child under the age of 17. In 2001, EGTRRA increased the credit from $500 to $1,000 and expanded refundability. The amount that may be claimed as a refund was 15 percent of earnings above $10,000. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 permanently extends these provisions for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012. Temporarily extend the 2009 modifications to the child tax credit. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provided that earnings above $3,000 would count toward refundability. The bill extends the ARRA child tax credit expansion for five additional years, through 2017. Permanently extend marriage penalty relief. In the past, when two persons were married, they often paid more taxes than if they had remained single. This discrepancy is known as the “marriage penalty.” This penalty arose in several contexts, including the following: (1) A married couple’s combined income often put them in a higher tax bracket than if they had remained single; (2) the standard deduction for a married couple was less than the standard deductions for two single persons; and (3) the earned income tax credit penalized married couples since their combined income placed them in or above the phaseout ranges for the credit. EGTRRA reduced the marriage penalty in the following ways: Key point. The $400,000, $425,000, and $450,000 amounts are adjusted annually for inflation beginning in 2014. Key point. The effective tax rate for many high-income taxpayers will be 23.8 percent because of the 20 percent capital gains and dividends tax rate plus the new 3.8 percent tax on investment income that was a feature of the Affordable Care Act (the healthcare reform legislation). Key point. Some analysts speculate that the reason Congress previously enacted a series of two-year “patches” to the AMT, rather than a one-time permanent fix, was to present a far more positive budgetary outlook based on the tenuous assumption that the AMT would not be patched in the future.
It increased the 15 percent income tax rate for a married couple filing a joint return to twice the size of the corresponding rate for a single person filing a single return. The increase was phased-in over four years, beginning in 2005.
The standard deduction for married persons filing jointly was increased to twice the standard deduction for single persons.
Prior to EGTRRA, the earned income credit penalized some individuals because they received a smaller earned income credit if they were married than if they were not married. This was due to the fact that the combined income of married couples made it more likely that they would enter or exceed the phaseout limits that reduce the amount of the credit due to higher earned income. In order to minimize this penalty, EGTRRA increased the phaseout amount for married taxpayers who file a joint return. For married taxpayers who file a joint return, EGTRRA increased the beginning and ending of the earned income credit phaseout by $3,000. These beginning and ending points have been adjusted annually for inflation after 2002. For 2012, the threshold phaseout amounts for single taxpayers, and married couples filing jointly, with one child are $17,090 and $22,300, respectively. The completed phaseout amounts are $36,920 and $44,130, respectively.
Read more about key tax law changes for churches and church leaders in Richard Hammar’s 2013 Church & Clergy Tax Guide, available at ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com or by calling 1-800-222-1840.
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
Why churches must understand the severe nature of a pedophile’s offenses.
Richard R. Hammar, Attorney, CPA
Bio
The term pedophile is widely used but poorly understood. Often, it is used synonymously with child molester. The American Psychiatric Association’s current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) identifies the following “diagnostic criteria” for pedophilia:
Note: Do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.
This definition implies that pedophiles are both promiscuous and predatory. These characteristics were noted in Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis (2010), by former FBI agent Kenneth Lanning. He notes:
Although a variety of individuals sexually abuse children, preferential-type sex offenders, and especially pedophiles, are the primary acquaintance sexual exploiters of children. A preferential-acquaintance child molester might molest 10, 50, hundreds, or even thousands of children in a lifetime, depending on the offender and how broadly or narrowly child molestation is defined. Although pedophiles vary greatly, their sexual behavior is repetitive and highly predictable ….
Those with a definite preference for children (i.e., pedophiles) have sexual fantasies and erotic imagery that focus on children. They have sex with children not because of some situational stress or insecurity but because they are sexually attracted to and prefer children. They have the potential to molest large numbers of child victims. For many of them their problem is not only the nature of the sex drive (attraction to children), but also the quantity (need for frequent and repeated sex with children). They usually have age and gender preferences for their victims.
The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers website states: “Offenders who seek out children to victimize by placing themselves in positions of trust, authority, and easy access to youngsters can have hundreds of victims over the course of their lifetimes. One study found that the average number of victims for non-incestuous pedophiles who molest girls is 20; for pedophiles who prefer boys, over 100.”
Church leaders also should also be aware that pedophilia generally is considered to be incurable, and very difficult to control. In addition, pedophiles have a high recidivism rate, meaning that those who are convicted and sentenced to prison are likely to revert to such behavior upon their release. The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers website states that “predatory pedophiles, especially those who molest boys, are the sex offenders who have the highest recidivism rates. Over long follow-up periods, more than half of convicted pedophiles are rearrested for a new offense.”
In summary, it is important for church leaders to understand the definition of pedophilia, since this condition is associated with several characteristics, including (1) promiscuity; (2) predatory behavior; (3) incurability; and (4) high recidivism rates.
The American Psychiatric Association has announced that a new edition of the DSM (“DSM-5”) will be implemented in May of 2013. The new edition includes several revisions, including the following revised “diagnostic criteria” for pedophilia:
“The dry research figures only confirm what I have seen over and over in this field: there are a lot of sexual offenses out there and the people who commit them don’t get caught very often. When an offender is caught and has a thorough evaluation with a polygraph backup, he will reveal dozens, sometimes hundreds of offenses he was never apprehended for. In an unpublished study by Pamela Van Wyk, 26 offenders in her incarcerated treatment program entered the program admitting an average of 3 victims each. Faced with a polygraph and the necessity of passing it to stay in the treatment program, the next group of 23 men revealed an average of 175 victims each.” Anna Salter, Predators: Pedophiles, Rapists, and Other Sex Offenders: Who They Are, How They Operate, and How We Can Protect Ourselves and Our Children (2003).
Need More Information?
Read about best practices on background screenings for church employees and volunteers at ChurchLawAndTax.com/private/library/screening.php. Develop a child sexual abuse prevention program for your church with Reducing the Risk, 3rd Edition, available at ChurchLawAndTaxStore.com or by calling 1-800-222-1840.
This article first appeared in Church Law & Tax Report, March/April 2013.
Church Law & Tax Report is published six times a year by Christianity Today International, 465 Gundersen Dr. Carol Stream, IL 60188. (800) 222-1840. © 2013 Christianity Today International. editor@churchlawandtax.com All rights reserved. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. “From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations.” Annual subscription: $69. Subscription correspondence: Church Law & Tax Report, PO Box 37012, Boone, IA 50037-0012.
Richard R. Hammar is an attorney, CPA and author specializing in legal and tax issues for churches and clergy.
The legal ins and outs of church mergers, acquisitions, and donations/dissolutions.
David Middlebrook
As economic pressures build, churches of various sizes and types are considering whether their church can—or should—merge with another church, acquire another church, or dissolve their church and donate the assets to another church (collectively referred to herein as “transactions”). These transactions have long been common in the business world, but interest in them has grown rapidly recently within the nonprofit sector. The very phrase “mergers and acquisitions” or the concept of these types of transactions can evoke many different images. Some may envision a hostile corporate takeover. Others may picture a fluid joining of two distinct bodies of believers and, as a result, becoming one church community. Still others may think of a resource-rich church with declining membership partnering with a vibrant church with few financial resources. While there are resources to help leaders evaluate the decision whether or not to merge, acquire, or dissolve, there is little guidance as to how to legally effectuate the transaction options available to churches. Before we begin discussing the options for these transactions in detail, it is important to take a step back and make sure the proper due diligence has been exercised before a church entertains one of these transactions. The overall goal of due diligence is to make sure that there has been sufficient inquiry and collection of information about the future church partner, surviving church, or dissolving church to enable your church to make an informed decision about what its next step should be. It is important that all parties have reviewed the legal and financial situation of the other church before formally committing to one of these transactions. Types of information that should be investigated during the due diligence period includes, but is certainly not limited to: governing documents (articles of incorporation, bylaws, amendments of the same); contracts; personnel policies and structure; agreements with vendors and other organizations; real estate records; marketing materials; programs; activities; IRS records; financial statements; audited financial reports; licenses; potential or current litigation issues; details about debts or other liabilities owed; and so on. The due diligence process requires the churches to work together in gathering and analyzing all the information. So although the due diligence process is incredibly important to the overall success of the transaction, it is also a good indicator of how well the churches will work together throughout the entire transaction. Several principles can make a merger or acquisition successful. Outlined below are 10 important principles, but church leaders should work with their church and legal counsel to develop a list of what would make the merger or acquisition successful. He should be the primary motivation for the merging or acquiring of another church. During the process, remember that everything should be done as unto Christ and to honor His bride, the church. Ephesians 5:22-23 compares the union of husband and wife to that of Christ and the church. The imagery and symbolism of marriage is often applied to Christ and the body of believers known as the church. Marriage is also a good way to describe the process of two church bodies merging together. It is important to remember to always go into negotiations or discussion with the mindset that the goal is for the new church community to be able to experience Jesus Christ on a deeper level. The goal of the discussions and negotiations should not be to “win” in the process or make the other team “lose”; it should all be done for the glory of God. In doing so, all the participants to the merger or acquisition will be exemplifications of a “win-win” outcome for all concerned and unto the body of Christ. Political pressure within the church, tough economic times, real property issues, and structural issues may not be the best motivations for a merger or acquisition. A positive motivation for a merger or acquisition means it is more likely to succeed. Make sure the churches have the same values and beliefs. If these core principles are too far apart, then there could be an issue down the road. Understand it’s a marathon, not a short sprint. Be prepared to have some really great times and some tough times throughout the process. Be patient. Let the process, negotiations, and discussions naturally happen. If the churches try to rush anything, then there is a strong likelihood that people will get frustrated easily, forget the reason for the deal in the first place, and potentially quit. Mistakes are generally made when parties try to race through negotiations or transactions, which can lead to big problems later. So be patient and try to focus on the mission of the transaction, not how quickly it can be accomplished. Allowing everyone to voice their expectations at the very beginning of discussions will enable each church to openly discuss expectations and allow each church to work together to make sure most of the expectations are met. Churches can get frustrated if they have a certain expectation coming into the transaction and the expectation is not met, so it is best if both churches make their expectations known up front. The leader during the discussions and negotiations of the transaction will set the tone for how each church’s staff and members respond to the upcoming changes. It is important to make sure that the leader is not necessarily someone who is highly compensated or has the most power. A leader is someone who is respected by all of the participants; someone who is called, personable, sees the vision, stays actively involved, and is equipped to lead the church. Ask any for-profit company what the most important task is in getting ready to sell or buy a business and the task would probably be due diligence. Although it is discussed above, it bears repeating: Just as due diligence is vital to any for-profit company merging or acquiring another for-profit entity, it is also true for nonprofits because they have liabilities, assets, creditors, leases, contracts, and agreements just like any for-profit company has. Therefore, it is very important that churches conduct due diligence in determining what the other church looks like at its core, underneath the ministries and programs that it conducts on a daily basis. What will things look like after the deal is completed? If a merger takes place, the churches should discuss what internal programs, ministries, and outreach programs the surviving church will continue to operate and support. The churches also must consider which employees will be employed with the surviving church. If an acquisition takes place, the purchasing church should decide whether it wants to continue any of the dissolving church’s programs or ministries and whether it wants to keep any of the dissolving church’s leaders. Do this by looking at other churches who have successfully (and unsuccessfully) undertaken the same type of transaction that your church might pursue. It is important for each church to understand what has (and has not) worked for others in the past, so that they can learn from the failures and successes of those transactions. Remember that whatever the leaders of the church do, however each church behaves during negotiation, and whatever the end result of the transaction is, it should all be done for the glory of God. Be prepared to have some really great times and some tough times throughout the process. Be patient. Let the process, negotiations, and discussions naturally happen. If the churches try to rush anything, then there is a strong likelihood that people will get frustrated easily, forget the reason for the deal in the first place, and potentially quit. Mistakes are generally made when parties try to race through negotiations or transactions, which can lead to big problems later. So be patient and try to focus on the mission of the transaction, not how quickly it can be accomplished. As a preliminary matter, it is important for a church to determine what a merger of two formerly distinct entities is. A merger is a formal legal process in which one of the pre-existing entities completely becomes a part of, or merges, with the second entity. The combined entity that remains after the merger is known as the “surviving entity,” having completely absorbed the other “merging entity.” Following the merger, the surviving entity assumes all liabilities of the merging entity, and continues to transact business as a unified whole moving forward in its daily operations. There are many complex matters to attend to during a formal merger. It is important that entities considering a merger not rush into the process and devote a great deal of time, prayer, and wise counsel in deciding whether a merger is something that should be explored. A merger will involve the consolidation of at least two, and sometimes more, formerly separate and distinct entities. Each may have very different cultures and operating procedures. It is crucial that churches considering a merger focus on what the merging entities have in common, and commit to working together in common purpose to develop shared values, vision, goals, and culture during the merger process. Generally speaking, it is helpful to look at a merger of two entities as analogous to a marriage relationship between two individuals. Like in a marriage, a merger is a complete combination, without reservation, of two formerly separate and distinct entities. The parties involved are not able to pick and choose from only the best parts of each party to merge. In a merger, entities combine the good, the bad, the ugly, and even the unknown. So, it is crucial that churches considering the merger process devote a significant amount of time, prayer, and analysis to the decision to merge. If it is determined at a later date that a merger was entered into too hastily, or the parties decide to separate at a later date, much like a divorce, the costs of separating can be extremely burdensome, not only spiritually, but also financially. If you are faced with a decision to combine two entities, it is important to determine when it is appropriate to consider a merger. There are many reasons why churches consider mergers. Mergers are often considered for economic reasons, changing community dynamics, property and facility concerns, a denominational mandate, or even a church plant that did not succeed as planned, among other reasons. It is also important to note that mergers are usually not the preferred transaction for combining entities for several reasons. The primary concern is that a merger entails the complete assumption of all liabilities, including unknown liabilities, by the surviving entity. However, there are some circ*mstances in which a formal merger may be the only option. An example of this scenario would be when there are known liabilities that cannot be dismissed or ignored, such as existing loans or pending lawsuits, which make an asset purchase alone impossible or inadvisable. As such, it may be helpful to consider a merger as an option of last resort if the other options discussed in this article are not available. If the decision to merge is made, it may be helpful to break the merger process down into a series of steps, which are as follows: Plan of merger. In this first step, initial discussions between church leadership of the merging entities will take place. Once the entities informally decide to embark upon this process, one of the parties will prepare a plan of merger, likely drafted by an attorney. This plan of merger will be presented to the church boards and possibly shared with church leadership or the congregations to determine if a merger is something that all parties involved would have interest in. Many questions will likely be asked and answered during this stage, which requires coordination and patience so that everyone involved can become comfortable with the thought of merging. Board resolution. If it is determined that a merger is something that all parties would like to explore further, a resolution of each church board will be drafted, again likely by an attorney, for approval. Depending on the structure of your church, it may also be necessary to obtain approval from any denominational authority during this stage, however this is not always required. If the boards of both churches approve the resolutions, then the formal process of merging can begin. Articles of merger. The main component of a church merger is the drafting and filing of articles of merger with the secretary of state. Articles of merger typically include the plan of merger or identify the location and accessibility of the plan of merger. Such articles also generally consist of a statement identifying the entities to be merged as well as the surviving entity. In addition, the articles require statements confirming that the merger has been approved by appropriate authorities within the merging entities, the effective date of the merger, and other statements and disclosures required under state law. It is important to note that the laws of each state will control what specific information must be included in the articles of merger, so it is advisable to consult an attorney regarding the specific required components for the state in which your church is incorporated. Notification and dissemination of the articles of merger. Once the articles of merger have been drafted, they will need to be considered and approved by the governing body of the church. In some churches, this is the board of directors. Other churches require a congregational vote. To determine who has authority to make this decision, the joining church will need to carefully review its corporate documents. Proper notice must be provided to either the board or the voting members of the church, if any, regarding the contents of the articles of merger and the scheduled meeting to vote on such articles. A meeting will then need to be held so that the articles of merger may be voted on and potentially approved. Meeting, voting, and filing. If the merger requires a congregational vote, at the noticed meeting, church leadership will answer any questions voting members may have regarding the merger and proposed articles of merger. A vote will then be held to determine whether or not the articles of merger will be approved by the church. If the governing body of the church is the board of directors, the board shall convene at a duly held meeting and carefully consider the proposed merger prior to voting on the issue. Once the merger has been approved by the proper governing body, the final formal step in the merger process will be to file the approved articles of merger with the secretary of state. Once the articles are filed, the merger will either be complete and effective or may not become effective until the receipt of a certificate of merger from the secretary of state. As with any transaction, there are positive and negative aspects to a merger. The primary positive aspect of a merger is that it is usually available as an option to merge two churches where there are known liabilities that cannot be dismissed or ignored. It may be helpful to look at mergers as a fallback position that will still be available in most circ*mstances if other more attractive options are not. Another positive feature of a merger is that a church that is facing difficulty or the possibility of having to close its doors will essentially be allowed to continue its ministry in some form or fashion. This may be preferable to an alternative, such as filing for bankruptcy protection or simply ceasing operations altogether. Also, when two entities merge, the community in which they are located does not lose a church. In some circ*mstances, a merger can result in the creation of a stronger and more stable ministry moving forward. However, there are downsides to mergers as well that must be carefully considered. As mentioned above, surviving entities will take on all liabilities of the merging entity, even those that are unknown at the time of merger. It is crucial for churches to perform solid and extensive due diligence before contemplating a merger. Even after the most diligent and thorough due diligence possible, though, the surviving church could still encounter previously unknown liabilities once the merger has been completed. Also, due to the complete absorption of the merging entity into the surviving entity, mergers take more time to complete, and potentially require coordination with other outside parties, such as lenders. Because of the complexity involved and the risk of outside involvement, mergers are also more expensive to complete than other transactions. Finally, because of the likely reorganization and possible replacement of senior staff, the congregation of the absorbed church will often have to become accustomed to new leadership within the surviving entity. In conclusion, a merger of formerly distinct entities can be an option for many churches. However, the formal merger process can be complex, time consuming, and can involve hidden pitfalls that the surviving entity should anticipate before committing to a merger. These issues must be anticipated and addressed not only before and during the merger process, but oftentimes well after the merger, as the merged entities become accustomed to the new structure in which they are now operating. As such, it will be important for churches considering a merger to retain legal counsel to guide them through the process so that ultimately, the surviving entity can emerge from the process as a healthy and united whole, and hopefully stronger than it had been as separate entities. The second option available to churches is to enter into an asset purchase agreement wherein the healthy lead church buys the assets of the joining church. An asset purchase transaction is a contractual agreement that allows the lead church to acquire either all or a selection of the joining assets and liabilities. The written agreements in such a transaction define the assets (and the liabilities, if necessary and/or agreed to) to be sold. In such an arrangement, the lead church would be purchasing whatever the two parties define as “the church” of the dying organization. Because certain assets and/or liabilities can be excluded from the transaction, asset purchase agreements are widely used contracts. By purchasing the assets of the joining church, the lead church can help to provide the joining church with enough cash funding so that the joining church can pay some or all of its existing liabilities such that the joining church can then completely wind down and dissolve. Assets can be nearly anything: buildings, real estate, hymnals, office supplies, nursery equipment, intellectual property, sound equipment, vehicles, and so on. Liabilities often attach themselves to the assets and travel with them; so, for example, if the joining church has an outstanding loan on its facilities, the loan would either need to be paid in full or would need to travel with the building in the asset purchase agreement. Depending on the circ*mstances, the joining church may need to notify its creditors of the impending transaction. For example, if the joining church is currently engaged in a commercial lease agreement, the joining church will need to notify its landlord that it will be dissolving and likely breaking the lease agreement earlier than contracted. The landlord may or may not agree to assign the lease to the lead church (assuming, of course, that the lead church wants to maintain the lease). Asset purchase agreements are fairly simple in nature, though the paperwork can seem complex. Since the primary goal of having a purchase asset agreement is to formally set out the exact arrangement as agreed to by the two churches, the agreement will need to specifically set out certain provisions. A church looking to enter into such an arrangement should absolutely seek advice and assistance from an attorney who can ensure that both parties have completed their respective due diligence requirements, as well as to make sure that the written agreement is in line with state laws and practices. The written agreement will need to contain provisions that may seem obvious to the involved parties, but—from a legal standpoint—are important to set out in a formal written agreement. For example, at a minimum the agreement should set out: In addition, the formal written agreement should state that the lead church has the authority and ability to buy the assets. Following the completion of the sale, the joining church should ideally be a mere shell of its former self, existing only long enough to disperse with any remaining liabilities and to complete and file the appropriate dissolution paperwork with the state in which the joining church is incorporated. Many churches are reluctant, if not completely opposed, to the idea of an “asset purchase agreement.” This reluctance is usually traced to the leaders of either the lead church or the joining church and their general avoidance of any actions that sound too “corporate” in nature. It is true that someone searching the term “asset purchase” online will find results for deals involving banks and oil companies. However, churches really should feel free to view these transactions in a more positive light. The widespread use of asset purchase agreements in the for-profit world means that these transactions have been tested and well received. In certain situations, particularly when there is some outstanding debt/liability that must be addressed before the joining church can be dissolved (and especially in situations when the joining church just does not have the resources to disperse of these debts/liabilities by their own means), the sale and purchase of the assets of the joining church may certainly be the best and easiest option for both parties. Moreover, from a public relations perspective, many congregation members will understand and approve of such transactions as they may already be familiar with them from their own business experience. Lastly, it is important that the joining church takes the extra steps to formally dissolve following the closing and transfer of assets to the lead church. For liability purposes, it is generally not advisable to leave an empty corporate shell in existence. In addition, the individual persons who served as the officers, directors, and employees of the joining church will often have moved on in their personal lives and will no longer want their names tied to an organization that is no longer functioning but which, because it is still in existence, could technically be sued. As with each of the transactions described in this article, there are both positive and negative aspects to asset purchase agreements that must be weighed by the leaders of both the lead church and joining church prior to entering into such a formal written agreement. In the case of an asset purchase, most tend to be positives for both parties. On the positive side for the joining church, asset purchase agreements allow it to receive some cash income that it can use to pay off any outstanding liabilities. No church wants to cease to exist without making good on the debts the organization took on in better financial times. Even more, no church wants to leave its former directors, officers, or employees personally on the hook for outstanding debts of the organization, which could be an issue if anyone signed off as a personal guarantee of the organization (something which is often required in order to enter into a commercial lease agreement, and so on). An asset purchase agreement would instead provide the joining church with the benefit of having cash reserves to pay its outstanding liabilities in total, or at least the ability to possibly settle for a lower payoff amount with the debt holder. The main advantage for the lead church is that it can set the specific terms that the joining church must abide by or agree to in order for the transaction to take place. Generally, most joining churches are looking to enter into such an arrangement because they have fallen on hard times and cannot continue (usually from a financial perspective) to continue their ministry. However, a lead church should proceed with caution when entering into an asset purchase. An asset purchase agreement allows the lead church to proceed with caution by setting its own terms by which it will legally effectuate the joining of the two organizations. This allows for a considerable amount of control on the part of the lead church. In addition, an asset purchase allows the lead church to merely purchase and assume known assets and liabilities. Whereas a merger leaves the lead church with both known and unknown risks, an asset purchase agreement only gives the lead church what it has paid for and agreed to in writing. For most churches, this option will be a better fit as compared to a merger. Simply speaking, most lead churches will not want to absorb the liabilities of the joining church. Possibly the only downside to an asset purchase transaction for the lead church is that the lead church must come up with whatever cash amount is agreed to in exchange for the assets of the joining church. As opposed to the third option below, a donation of assets rather than a purchase of assets, the joining church has to actually expend resources in order to obtain the parts of the joining church that it wants. This could cause the lead church to need to take out a loan or pull together resources originally intended for other ministry activities. This particular section explores how two churches can join forces through a transaction where a church donates its assets to another church and then dissolves (“donation/dissolution”). In this scenario, a church determines that it wants to combine with another church. After the church (the “joining church”) identifies and pays off any outstanding debts, it then donates all remaining assets to another tax-exempt, nonprofit organization (the “lead church”). The joining church then formally dissolves by filing the appropriate dissolution information in the state where the church was incorporated. By filing the dissolution information, the joining church will end its corporate existence. A donation/dissolution is likely the cleanest, most straightforward, and quickest methods of combining two organizations. Because only assets are transferred, the lead church does not face known or unknown liabilities of the joining church being imputed to the lead church. This is of particular comfort to lead churches who will not have to face the unpleasant situation of finding out that the joining church has, for example, had sexual abuse claims filed against it or has previously filed for bankruptcy. Because only assets are transferred, the lead church will not have to fear the risk of absorbing liabilities of the joining church. This particular transaction of combining churches is a great option to consider because it is appropriate in a wide variety of situations—even when the motivation for the combination of churches differs. For instance, a donation/dissolution is appropriate where one church has decreasing attendance, struggling finances, and desires to be absorbed by a healthier, more vibrant church community. It is also appropriate in circ*mstances where a larger church is seeking to establish another satellite campus and a church in the desired location wants to become the actual satellite campus. Even though this option is highly versatile and is appropriate in a variety of circ*mstances, use of the donation/dissolution should not be used in situations where the joining church has substantial debt that it is unable to pay off prior to dissolving. For example, a church will not be permitted to dissolve if it has an outstanding mortgage or judgment from a lawsuit. Rather, the donation/dissolution should only be used in situations where the joining church either has no existing debt or it has the ability to pay all debts prior to dissolution. The reason for this limitation can sometimes be found in the church’s dissolution clause. This clause is a key component of corporate documents for most organizations and it is critical to an organization’s operation as a tax-exempt organization. If an organization’s corporate documents do not contain a dissolution clause, state law will likely impose it. Essentially, the dissolution clause requires that, upon dissolving, a tax-exempt organization must distribute its assets to another tax-exempt organization. Most dissolution clauses require that all liabilities be paid prior to distributing remaining assets to another tax-exempt organization. In today’s economic conditions, the likelihood of finding a church with no debt is probably small, especially when many of the churches seeking to combine with other churches may be doing so because of financial stress they may be experiencing. Despite this limitation, it is not impossible for churches that have debt to utilize the donation/dissolution method so long as the church pays off all debt prior to dissolving. For example, if the joining church has a large mortgage on its building, the church would not be eligible for dissolution unless it first paid off its mortgage. If a church’s debt is large and the likelihood that the church could pay it off prior to dissolution is minimal, then the church should consider a different option of combining entities, such as a merger. If you are considering using the donation/dissolution method to combine with another church, you will need to be prepared to walk through the following steps to effectuate the transfer of assets and ultimate dissolution of the joining church. Specifically, you will need to do the following: Review corporate documents of joining church. After identifying that donation/dissolution is the route that the joining church wants to take, the church’s corporate documents should be carefully reviewed to determine whether the documents contain any form of reversionary clause that may restrict the church from donating assets only to a certain organization or church upon dissolution. Oftentimes, an organization’s corporate documents contain a reversionary clause that restricts the church from donating to any organization other than the local or national denominational body that the church historically was a part of. If this is the case, and the joining church wants to donate its assets to an organization other than the one identified in its corporate documents, it will be necessary for the joining church to amend its corporate documents and include a revised dissolution clause that permits the joining church to donate its assets to any organization that has been recognized as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Governing body of the joining church must authorize donation of assets and dissolution. The determination to dissolve must be made by the governing body of the joining churches. In some churches, this is the board of directors. Other churches require a congregational vote to dissolve. To determine who has authority to make this decision, the joining church will need to carefully review its corporate documents. The provisions of the joining church’s corporate documents apply and must be strictly followed even if, in practice, the church does not follow the bylaws. After holding a board or congregational vote, the joining church should properly document the decision either in a resolution or minutes of the meeting. Governing body of the lead church should vote to accept donation of assets. Just as the joining church must vote and properly document its decision to dissolve and donate all assets, the lead church should also vote to accept the assets. In some situations, the lead church will be establishing a satellite campus where the joining church is located. If this is the case, the joining church should also vote to establish the satellite campus. Again, all decisions should be properly documented and retained in the organization’s corporate records. Identify all assets, liabilities, and outstanding contracts. The joining church will need to make a detailed list of all assets and liabilities. Assets, such as buildings, land, vehicles, sound equipment, chairs, and cash should be inventoried. It is helpful to create a spreadsheet that identifies the item and an approximate fair market value of each item. For large assets, such as property and vehicles, related documents, such as deeds or title documents, should be compiled for review. As further discussed below, in the case of the transfer of real property (such as land or buildings) or titled documents (such as vehicles), new documents will need to be drafted and executed to effectuate the actual transfer of these assets. In addition, the joining church will need to compile a list of all outstanding liabilities. Liabilities include amounts owed to vendors, including amounts owed for any loans. The joining church should also compile all vendor contracts that it currently has, including lease agreements, copier agreements, and so on. These contracts will be terminated upon dissolution. Pay all liabilities. As previously discussed, a donation/dissolution is appropriate in situations where the joining church does not have existing debt or liabilities at the time of dissolution. This means that the joining church either does not have any debt or it has the ability to pay off existing debt prior to dissolving. If the joining church has debt, it should pay these amounts and maintain appropriate documentation regarding such payments. Identify and address restricted gifts. After paying off all liabilities, the joining church must also make sure that it has returned any designated gifts that have not been utilized for the purpose for which they were specifically given. For example, if the joining church received a gift that was restricted for the use of the church’s building funds, the joining church either needs to return the donation or request the donor’s permission to include the gift as a general asset that will be donated to another tax-exempt organization upon the church’s dissolution. Donation of assets. Once all liabilities have been paid and restricted gifts are either returned or designated by the donor for use (such as for donation), the joining church will proceed to donate all remaining assets to the lead church. Assets include all buildings, sound equipment, tables, vehicles, money, and so on. In the event the joining church is donating real property (such as land or buildings), it will need to transfer the property by deed and then properly record the deed with the local county clerk. The property records should reflect the donation of the property to the lead church and show the lead church as the new owner of the property. Filing dissolution information. It is important for the joining church to formally dissolve its corporate existence after all of its assets have been transferred to the lead church. This is accomplished by filing the appropriate articles or certificate with the state in which the church is incorporated. This step is often ignored by churches because it is the last one to be addressed. However, as discussed above, it is not a good idea to leave an empty corporate shell in existence for liability reasons. Failing to dissolve the corporate entity leaves all of the church’s officers, directors, and employees susceptible to legal claims asserted against the church, even if the church is no longer operating. So long as the church’s corporate shell exists, it can still be sued. For this reason, it is imperative that the joining church’s corporate existence be formally dissolved. Even though the donation/dissolution is the cleanest and quickest method and, overall, is a great option because it is appropriate in a wide variety of situations, there are a number of steps that must be taken in order to ensure that the process is correctly performed. A fundamental legal issue that must be considered, especially by the joining church, is to carefully examine the church’s existing corporate documents for any guidance. A threshold question that is often, but not always, answered in the corporate bylaws is, “Who is empowered to authorize the dissolution?” A related and sometimes difficult issue for a member-driven congregation is, “Who is actually qualified as a member?” It may be prudent to carefully scrub the membership roll, publicly and while giving notice, to determine who will be eligible to authorize the dissolution. It is important to have a sense of who is able to vote and legally authorize the dissolution. While it is fundamentally true that these transactions are “religious questions” not subject to state interference, it is also true that such transactions must occur in accordance with the state’s procedures and these often entail the submission of affirmations and/or evidence that the process for authorizing dissolution has been consistent with existing bylaws. Moreover, it is not a rare occurrence for a joining church to have to amend its own bylaws in advance of authorizing a transaction. This may be due to the need to remove any reversionary clauses that might exist, (for instance, “If the church is ever sold, then the assets shall revert to …”). In some states and in some denominations there is a tradition of having the bylaws reflect that the assets revert to a like-minded church or denomination. This must be carefully considered and dealt with or the transaction will be subject to a collateral attack and may not even make it through the title company’s due diligence efforts. Therefore, it is always best for a church to keep their corporate documents up to date. A related issue that is important to highlight is to not only look to the bylaws and other corporate documents, which may be amended by following the appropriate procedures, but also to give careful attention to the deed of conveyance that brought the church into title in the first place. In some parts of the country, there can be significant deed restrictions that can greatly alter the positive trajectory of any proposed transaction. If the church, for instance, has significant debt and also has a significant restriction in its deed such that the market significantly discounts the property, then a problem may exist. Imagine a situation where there is significant debt, but the deed the church took to get the property states that “the property will only be used as a church and in such case as it is ever sold or dispossessed of its use as a church, it will revert to a particular family, or, that the property may be sold but can never be used for a commercial purpose that includes the sale of alcohol” and a restaurant wants to purchase the property. These kinds of deed restrictions can be much more time-consuming and costly to deal with and may make it much more difficult to manage the transaction process. It is best to know what deed restrictions exist up front. Early in the process, churches should have the courage to ask not only, “Which organization survives?” (which, of course, may be a no-brainer in some cases from a financial and operational standpoint), but also should ask the harder and more specific question, “Which employees will remain and what will be their respective roles?” Legally, the remaining church employees likely will need to sign new employment agreements, and anyone with access to children will need new background checks performed. Also, any new volunteers will also need to be appropriately screened and re-qualified. A potentially more important issue is to boldly initiate a full and frank discussion as soon as practical about the future roles and authority of all the employees involved. This is the big elephant in the room and it should be acknowledged and discussed prior to the completion of the transaction. This will entail fairly high-level discussions and some degree of confidentiality to work through these issues in a way that will increase the possibility of a successful integration. Ideally, this kind of discussion will occur in advance of any legal due diligence and certainly before the drafting of the plan of merger or other transaction documents. Assuming the church owns its property free and clear, new deeds will need to be drafted and recorded if the property is going to be conveyed to the surviving church or ultimately sold/donated to a third-party, nonprofit entity. A real estate agent and title company will ensure that any transfer occurs according to the relevant legal procedures. Also, as discussed above, it is important to pay close attention to any current deed restrictions that may be an issue for either the surviving church or a third-party purchaser/donee. Also, if the selling/donating church’s property is subject to a mortgage, the debt will likely need to be paid in full or discussions will need to occur with the lender in order to draft new loan documents. It’s very possible for the surviving, purchasing, or donee church—if it seeks to retain the other church’s property—to either pay off the mortgage or negotiate better terms, depending on the respective financial conditions of the parties. If the church’s property is subject to a commercial lease agreement, you need to contact an attorney while you initiate your own review and discussions with the landlord. Ideally, you would address the lease situation in advance of the transaction process. The church should know exactly where it stands with respect to its current lease, whether the current lease can be terminated, and what it may mean for the surviving, purchasing, or donee church to be potentially stepping in its shoes and be responsible for performing under the lease if it cannot be terminated. As part of the due diligence process, the merging entity will need to inventory all of its personal property, including books, equipment, nursery furniture and toys, computers, desks, phones, and so on. It is useful to obtain a schedule of fixed assets and their locations, any Uniform Commercial Code filings, a schedule of equipment leases, and a schedule of sales and purchases of equipment in the prior three years. Aside from the physical inventory list, it is also necessary to provide an inventory of outstanding vendor contracts and other commitments. All material agreements that encumber real or personal property owned by the church, including mortgages, pledges, security agreements or financing statements, if any, should also be examined. It is also helpful to obtain a list of any vendor or service providers who, for whatever reason, have expressly declined to do business with the church. It is important for merging churches and churches that are going to dissolve as a result of the above transactions to examine their restricted donations or designated funds given to their church. Donations or funds that are given for a designated purpose must be used for such purpose(s). In some states, the nonprofit (such as a church) is under a fiduciary duty to ensure that the funds are only used for their restricted or designated purpose. Therefore, it is important that churches deal with restricted gifts and designated funds before getting too far into the transaction process. The easiest way to find out whether the restricted funds can be transferred to the new church or used for a purpose other than the one previously indicated is by directly asking the donor. If the donor agrees to remove the restriction, change the purpose, or allow the restricted funds to be transferred to the surviving church, then such a change should be made in writing. However, there is a strong possibility that some donors may no longer be at the address the church has on file or may no longer be living. The Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (“UPMIFA”) governs such circ*mstances and other issues regarding restricted gifts. UPMIFA has been enacted by many states in some form or fashion, so the church should examine and understand the UPMIFA laws in the state where the church is incorporated. If all of the avenues above have been exhausted, the church may be forced to go to court and see if the judge will remove the restriction. It is also possible that some donors may simply request that the donation be returned to them instead of changed or transferred. This situation is likely rare, however, because the donor has probably already taken a charitable deduction for the donation at the time it was given. The IRS has stated that if a donor receives a donation back from the charitable entity, the donor must include such amount in the taxpayer’s gross income in the year received. Therefore, many donors will have no interest in paying tax on the returned donation and would allow the donation to be transferred or the restriction removed. If, however, a request is made to return the donation to the donor, the church should consult with legal counsel in determining whether to return the donation and the terms of the refund. The most precious asset a church has is its tax-exempt status. Tax issues and reporting requirements must be examined to ensure protection of the church’s tax-exempt status. The first important tax issue that must be considered when a merger between two or more churches occurs is their tax-exempt statuses. It is best that none of the parties take any action that would jeopardize their tax-exempt statuses because the surviving, purchasing, or donee church will continue to perform exempt activities and will need its exempt status. In IRS private letter ruling (“PLR”) 9314059, two exempt organizations proposed a plan to merge the two existing exempt organizations into one surviving organization. The surviving organization would remain in existence and the other organization’s assets and liabilities would be transferred to, and assumed by, the surviving organization and then would dissolve. The business purpose for the merger was to lessen the administrative burdens of operating two exempt organizations and eliminate duplicative administrative services. The IRS concluded that because the surviving organization after the merger would continue to promote its exempt purposes and the merger of the two organizations had a causal relationship to the furtherance of the surviving organization’s exempt purpose, the surviving organization’s exempt status was unaffected by the merger of the two organizations. So, will the surviving church maintain its tax-exempt status? Section 508(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, (the “Code”) provides that a new organization organized after October 9, 1969, shall not be treated as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code unless it has given notice that it is applying for recognition of such status. Therefore, an issue arises as to whether the surviving church would be considered a “new organization” for purposes of section 508(a) of the Code and be required to apply for recognition of such status. In PLR 9314059, the IRS concluded that the surviving organization was not considered a new organization, meaning notice as described in section 508(a) of the Code was not required. Another important tax issue is whether the merger or acquisition would give rise to unrelated business income tax. Section 511 of the Code imposes a tax on unrelated business income of organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Section 513 of the Code defines “unrelated trade or business,” as any trade or business the conduct of which is not substantially related to the exercise or performance by such organization of its charitable, educational, or other purposes or function constituting the basis for exemption under section 501 of the Code. Section 1.513-1(d)(2) of the Treasury Regulations provides that a trade or business is “related” to the exempt purposes only where the conduct of the business activity has a causal relationship to the achievement of any exempt purpose, and is “substantially related” for purposes of section 513 of the Code only if the causal relationship is a substantial one. Thus, for the conduct of a trade or business from which a particular amount of gross income is derived, to be “substantially related” to purposes for which tax-exempt status is granted, the production or distribution of goods or the performance of services from which the gross income is derived must contribute importantly to the accomplishment of those purposes. The IRS concluded in PLR 9314059 that the merger between the two organizations would contribute to the accomplishments of the surviving organization’s exempt purposes; therefore, the transfer of assets with respect to the merger was related to the furtherance of the surviving organization’s exempt purposes. Because the merger was related to the furtherance of the surviving organization’s exempt purpose, the transfer did not result in unrelated business income pursuant to sections 511 through 513 of the Code. Although the IRS in PLR 9314059 concluded that the merger did not result in unrelated business income, there are several other reasons why the IRS has generally concluded that mergers, acquisitions, or consolidations do not produce unrelated business taxable income. First, section 512(b)(5) of the Code provides that all losses from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of property shall be excluded from unrelated business taxable income. Second, in PLR 9738055, the IRS concluded that the transfer of assets through a merger or similar transaction is a contribution, which does not give rise to unrelated business income for the donor and donee. Third, the IRS concluded in PLR 9530036 that the proposed merger and transfer of assets was a “one time event” and thus did not possess the characteristics of a regularly carried on trade or business within the meaning of section 513 of the Code. The tax implications of the transactions discussed in this article must be fully examined by a tax attorney or tax professional prior to the transaction taking place. Each transaction is different and none of them are worth risking a church’s tax-exempt status. Churches must be very careful to follow state laws and reporting requirements when dissolving or merging with another church. Each state’s laws vary with respect to all different aspects of a nonprofit organization’s incorporation, operation, and dissolution. For example, Texas law prohibits a Texas nonprofit corporation from merging with another entity if the Texas nonprofit corporation will lose or impair its charitable status as a result of the merger. In California, the attorney general must approve certain transactions when a nonprofit is involved. It is important to examine state law to make sure all laws are followed, the appropriate paperwork is filed with the state and the appropriate state agencies are involved. Although every state is different, the church is generally required to file the articles of merger or a certificate of merger with the secretary of state’s office. The dissolving corporation will be required to file articles of dissolution or a certificate of dissolution with the office. While some state laws are very similar, it is always prudent to understand the state law where the church was incorporated. In Texas, for example, the Business Organizations Code section 22.251 provides that the directors must approve a plan of merger, if there are no members of the corporation. If the corporation is managed by its members then, if certain requirements are met, the members can approve the plan of merger. The requirements before a merger takes place are similar, under Texas law, to when the nonprofit corporation sells all or substantially all of its assets. The directors must vote to approve the sale of all or substantially all of the nonprofit corporation’s assets, unless members manage the corporation. The church must also, if they are dissolving, follow the state requirements for dissolution. In Texas, the directors must vote to dissolve the corporation (unless the corporation is managed by members). The directors in charge of winding up the nonprofit corporation must also pay close attention to the state laws in order to avoid any potential personal liability resulting from the rules not being closely followed. For a host of reasons, mergers, acquisitions, and donations/dissolutions of churches are here to stay. It has taken a tough economy and other struggles for the nonprofit world to discover that these transactions can actually benefit both parties in certain situations. Although the process and the details can seem exhausting, the end result is a potentially larger and more financially robust and stable church where its members can continue to promote the church’s mission, ministry, and good works in its community and beyond. As it says in Proverbs, “A house is built by wisdom and becomes strong through good sense” (Proverbs 24:3, NLT). This verse emphasizes the good sense that each church will need to exercise to make sure that its transaction is a success and in the best interest of the church. Each church should make sure it assembles a good team of legal and accounting professionals, who are vitally important to making the transaction a success. Each church should also make sure it picks the right church leaders to work with the members of the church, the pastors of the church, and the professionals assisting the church. And above all, make the Lord the main part of the process. “For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:16-17, NIV).Due diligence
10 keys to successful transactions
1. Keep Jesus Christ front and center.
2. Verify the motivations for the merger or acquisition.
3. Compare purposes and values.
4. Give each church time to discuss and present their expectations.
5. Wisely choose your leader.
6. Do your homework.
7. Discuss the ideal “final picture” of the transaction.
8. Understand why others failed.
9. Glorify God.
10. Understand, it’s a marathon, not a short sprint.
Mergers
What is a merger?
When should we consider a merger?
How do we accomplish a merger?
What are the pros and cons of a merger?
Asset purchase and dissolution
What is an asset purchase and dissolution?
When should a church use this option?
What are the pros and cons of an asset purchase and dissolution?
Donation/Dissolution
What is a donation/dissolution?
When can a donation/dissolution be used?
How do we accomplish a donation/dissolution?
Issues for all transactions
Corporate documents
Deed restrictions
Employees
Real property
Personal property
Restricted gifts
Tax reporting
State reporting
Final Thoughts
Inadequate records can prove costly for pastors and leaders.
Michael E. Batts, CPA
Bio
In recent years, actual and perceived abuses in the area of executive expenses and “perks” have helped trigger stricter federal tax laws governing churches and other nonprofit organizations and prompted greater scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service. Many churches struggle with this area of compliance. For the purposes of this article, we use the term “executive expenses” to refer to expenses incurred by the leaders of a church that could appear to be personal in nature if not properly documented as business expenses. Common examples include, but are not limited to, expenses for travel, meals, hospitality, gifts, supplies, club memberships, and other similar expenditures. Under federal tax law, documentation for travel, meals, hospitality, and similar expenses must include the nature of the business activity conducted, the people involved in the activity, and the places at which the activity was conducted. Payment of such expenses incurred by church leaders must be made pursuant to an “accountable plan.” (An accountable plan is one wherein such expenses are properly substantiated in a timely manner by documentation as required by the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations.) If executive expenses are not properly substantiated in a timely manner, they are required to either be repaid by the individual who incurred them or treated as taxable compensation to that individual. If executive expenses are incurred and not properly substantiated in a timely manner, and if the expenses are not either repaid by the executive or treated as taxable compensation to him/her, the payment of such expenses by the church may constitute “automatic excess benefit transactions” under federal tax law. Excess benefit transactions are prohibited. Federal sanctions for excess benefit transactions generally include a requirement that the person receiving the “benefits” (inadequately documented executive expenses) return the full amount of any such expenses to the church and pay an initial penalty tax of 25 percent of the “excess benefit amount” (the amount of the inadequately documented expenses). If the excess benefit transaction is not corrected in a timely manner, an additional penalty tax of 200 percent can apply to the person who incurred the expenses. Officials who knowingly approve such transactions may be subject to personal penalties as well. A church faced with inadequately documented executive expenses generally has two options in order to avoid excess benefit transactions:“Accountable plan” rules
If the rules are broken
Addressing inadequate documentation
Michael (Mike) E. Batts is a CPA and the managing partner of Batts Morrison Wales & Lee, P.A., an accounting firm dedicated exclusively to serving nonprofit organizations across the United States.